101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16548993)
1. Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears.
Alves VA; Castelo A; Filho AL; Vianna MR; Taromaru E; Namiyama G; Lorincz A; Dores GB;
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 16548993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma.
Navone R; Burlo P; Pich A; Pentenero M; Broccoletti R; Marsico A; Gandolfo S
Cytopathology; 2007 Dec; 18(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 18031448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
Duggan MA; Khalil M; Brasher PM; Nation JG
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions.
Hayama FH; Motta AC; Silva Ade P; Migliari DA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005; 10(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15735543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized crossover trial of PAPNET for primary cervical screening.
Irwig L; Macaskill P; Farnsworth A; Wright RG; McCool J; Barratt A; Simpson JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 57(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 15019013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear.
Park J; Jung EH; Kim C; Choi YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Aug; 35(8):488-92. PubMed ID: 17636495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology.
Boost T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 19459203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lubricant, mucus, and other contaminant materials as a potential source of interpretation errors in ThinPrep cervical cytology.
AbdullGaffar B; Kamal MO; Khalid M; Samuel R; AlGhufli R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Jan; 14(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 20040832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a national survey.
Confortini M; Di Bonito L; Carozzi F; Ghiringhello B; Montanari G; Parisio F; Prandi S;
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 17168918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of agreement between conventional and liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer early detection based on analysis of 2,091 smears: experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
Girianelli VR; Santos Thuler LC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):545-9. PubMed ID: 17703446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A peer comparison program for the quality assurance of human papillomavirus DNA detection using the Digene Hybrid Capture II/SurePath method shows excellent analytic interlaboratory correlation.
Kuebler DL; Illingworth A; Blenc AM; Wilbur DC
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17879373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePath liquid-based cytology system.
Narine N; Young W
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 17578516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell block as an adjunct to conventional Papanicolaou smear for diagnosis of cervical cancer in resource-limited settings.
Gupta S; Halder K; Khan VA; Sodhani P
Cytopathology; 2007 Oct; 18(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 17681012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of static telecytological diagnoses' reproducibility in cervical smears prepared by means of liquid-based cytology.
Tsilalis T; Archondakis S; Meristoudis C; Margari N; Pouliakis A; Skagias L; Panayiotides I; Karakitsos P
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):516-20. PubMed ID: 22856666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
