These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16549249)
1. Are we at the start of a new era in diagnostic research? Buntinx F; Knottnerus JA J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):325-6. PubMed ID: 16549249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Searching the biomedical literature: research study designs and critical appraisal. Callas PW Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18335861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles. Lang T Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Eroding precision in scientific communications: contagion from "the real world". Lyles A Clin Ther; 2007 Jan; 29(1):182. PubMed ID: 17379059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new network to promote evidence-based research. Chalmers I; Nylenna M Lancet; 2014 Nov; 384(9958):1903-4. PubMed ID: 25435440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement! Heddle NM; Ness P Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the quality of reporting of research studies. Jordan KP; Lewis M Musculoskeletal Care; 2009 Sep; 7(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 19347878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Macleod MR; Fisher M; O'Collins V; Sena ES; Dirnagl U; Bath PM; Buchan A; van der Worp HB; Traystman RJ; Minematsu K; Donnan GA; Howells DW Int J Stroke; 2009 Feb; 4(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 19236488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Surgical research or comic opera" redux. Sade RM Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Oct; 82(4):1173-4. PubMed ID: 16996902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tips for making a good research proposal. Setiati S Acta Med Indones; 2004; 36(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15673937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies. Hyde CJ; Stanworth SJ; Murphy MF Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 18194387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Unpleasant surprises: how the Introduction has wandered into the Discussion. Wells WA J Cell Biol; 2006 Sep; 174(6):741. PubMed ID: 16954351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Touchstone Process: an ongoing critical evaluation of reiki in the scientific literature. Baldwin AL; Vitale A; Brownell E; Scicinski J; Kearns M; Rand W Holist Nurs Pract; 2010; 24(5):260-76. PubMed ID: 20706088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Type I error in headache research. Houle TT; Turner DP; Penzien DB Headache; 2013; 53(7):1031-3. PubMed ID: 23773114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating clinical information: the role of the review article. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 17761315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What's in your toolbox? Considerations when selecting and evaluating instruments in clinical research. Hedges C AACN Adv Crit Care; 2008; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Some methodological issues about measurements in health]. Alarcón Ma AM; Muñoz N S Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 18483663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Animal research: raise standards to protect patients. Green S Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7212):460. PubMed ID: 18818630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]