147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16549434)
1. Morphometric methods to evaluate craniofacial growth: study in rabbits.
de Abreu AT; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16549434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The craniofacial phenotype of the Crouzon mouse: analysis of a model for syndromic craniosynostosis using three-dimensional MicroCT.
Perlyn CA; DeLeon VB; Babbs C; Govier D; Burell L; Darvann T; Kreiborg S; Morriss-Kay G
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Nov; 43(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 17105336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A cephalometric study of the pterygoid process during growth].
Harnet JC; Kahn JL; Bacon W; Sick H
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1995; 96(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7732322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Observations on growth of various parts of the facial skull using lateral teleradiography].
Hollmann K; Strassl H
Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl Gesamte; 1973 Jan; 60(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 4512185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental unilateral coronal synostosis in rabbits.
Persing JA; Babler WJ; Jane JA; Duckworth PF
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1986 Mar; 77(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 3952194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The mesh diagram for analysis of facial growth.
Moorrees CF; Efstratiadis SS; Kent RL
Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 2057488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition: development of an animal model.
O'Donovan DA; Yeung I; Zeman V; Neligan PC; Pang CY; Forrest CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 12(6):533-43. PubMed ID: 11711819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sagittal craniofacial growth evaluated on children dry skulls using V2 and V3 canal openings as references.
Harnet JC; Lombardi T; Lutz JC; Meyer P; Kahn JL
Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Oct; 29(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 17653618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
Yoon SS; Chung CH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal posteroanterior changes in transverse and vertical craniofacial structures between 10 and 14 years of age.
Yavuz I; Ikbal A; Baydaş B; Ceylan I
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 15529496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Craniofacial growth in cleidocranial dysplasia--a roentgencephalometric study.
Jensen BL; Kreiborg S
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1995; 15(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 7601912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
