These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16549855)

  • 1. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
    Hayden JA; Côté P; Bombardier C
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 144(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 16549855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.
    Babic A; Tokalic R; Amílcar Silva Cunha J; Novak I; Suto J; Vidak M; Miosic I; Vuka I; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30953448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Stahmeyer J; Krauth C; Walter U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 6():Doc07. PubMed ID: 21289880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.].
    Whiting P; Savović J; Higgins JPT; Caldwell DM; Reeves BC; Shea B; Davies P; Kleijnen J; Churchill R;
    Recenti Prog Med; 2018 Sep; 109(9):421-431. PubMed ID: 30303184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results: guidance for future prognosis reviews.
    Hayden JA; Chou R; Hogg-Johnson S; Bombardier C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):781-796.e1. PubMed ID: 19136234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
    Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.
    Hayden JA; van der Windt DA; Cartwright JL; Côté P; Bombardier C
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 158(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 23420236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey.
    Meursinge Reynders R; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):249. PubMed ID: 29216930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research.
    ; Seel RT; Sherer M; Whyte J; Katz DI; Giacino JT; Rosenbaum AM; Hammond FM; Kalmar K; Pape TL; Zafonte R; Biester RC; Kaelin D; Kean J; Zasler N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 91(12):1795-813. PubMed ID: 21112421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
    Husk K; Lovell R; Cooper C; Stahl-Timmins W; Garside R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 May; 2016(5):CD010351. PubMed ID: 27207731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.