These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16550854)

  • 1. Preparedness for action: responding to the snake in the grass.
    Flykt A
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 16550854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search with biological threat stimuli: accuracy, reaction times, and heart rate changes.
    Flykt A
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 16187870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Snakes and cats in the flower bed: fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals.
    Lipp OV; Derakshan N; Waters AM; Logies S
    Emotion; 2004 Sep; 4(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 15456393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence.
    Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 17516810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fear makes you stronger: responding to feared animal targets in visual search.
    Flykt A; Lindeberg S; Derakshan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1437-45. PubMed ID: 22744740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting the snake in the grass: attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children.
    Lobue V; DeLoache JS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Mar; 19(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 18315802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Of snakes and flowers: does preferential detection of pictures of fear-relevant animals in visual search reflect on fear-relevance?
    Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 16768561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.
    Ohman A; Flykt A; Esteves F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Sep; 130(3):466-78. PubMed ID: 11561921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When spiders appear suddenly: spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders.
    Gerdes AB; Alpers GW; Pauli P
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Feb; 46(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 18154873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task.
    Lipp OV; Derakshan N
    Emotion; 2005 Sep; 5(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 16187873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Lundqvist D; Ohman A
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1032-42. PubMed ID: 19695561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: the role of automaticity and material-specificity.
    Reinecke A; Becker ES; Rinck M
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1053-63. PubMed ID: 19643570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How preferential is the preferential encoding of threatening stimuli? Working memory biases in specific anxiety and the Attentional Blink.
    Reinecke A; Rinck M; Becker ES
    J Anxiety Disord; 2008 May; 22(4):655-70. PubMed ID: 17681743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spiders crawl easily through the bottleneck: visual working memory for negative stimuli.
    Reinecke A; Rinck M; Becker ES
    Emotion; 2006 Aug; 6(3):438-49. PubMed ID: 16938085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: how specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli?
    Blanchette I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Aug; 59(8):1484-504. PubMed ID: 16846972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the category effect: the influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search.
    Smilek D; Dixon MJ; Merikle PM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 16510131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threat-relevance impairs executive functions: negative impact on working memory and response inhibition.
    Lindström BR; Bohlin G
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):384-93. PubMed ID: 22468619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.