140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16552008)
1. Correlation of carotid stenosis diameter and cross-sectional areas with CT angiography.
Bartlett ES; Symons SP; Fox AJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Mar; 27(3):638-42. PubMed ID: 16552008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between intracranial vertebral artery stenosis diameter measured by digital subtraction angiography and cross-sectional area measured by optical coherence tomography.
Feng Y; Wu T; Wang T; Li Y; Li M; Li L; Yang B; Bai X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Gao P; Chen Y; Ma Y; Jiao L
J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 Nov; 13(11):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 33229421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography.
Bartlett ES; Walters TD; Symons SP; Fox AJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16418349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid stenosis index revisited with direct CT angiography measurement of carotid arteries to quantify carotid stenosis.
Bartlett ES; Walters TD; Symons SP; Fox AJ
Stroke; 2007 Feb; 38(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 17170356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid stenosis degree in CT angiography: assessment based on luminal area versus luminal diameter measurements.
Zhang Z; Berg M; Ikonen A; Könönen M; Kälviäinen R; Manninen H; Vanninen R
Eur Radiol; 2005 Nov; 15(11):2359-65. PubMed ID: 16228216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model-based measurements of the diameter of the internal carotid artery in CT angiography images.
Gratama van Andel HA; Venema HW; Bol K; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA; Streekstra GJ
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5711-27. PubMed ID: 21158283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of semi-automated measurement of carotid stenosis on CTA.
White JH; Bartlett ES; Bharatha A; Aviv RI; Fox AJ; Thompson AL; Bitar R; Symons SP
Can J Neurol Sci; 2010 Jul; 37(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 20724259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of carotid stenosis by millimeter CT angiography measures: effects of prevalence and gender.
Bartlett ES; Walters TD; Symons SP; Aviv RI; Fox AJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1677-83. PubMed ID: 18653685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. COMPARISON OF CAROTID STENOSIS GRADING BY CT ANGIOGRAPHY AND DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY: HOW THE STATISTICAL METHODS APPLIED INFLUENCE THE RESULTS.
Samaržija K; Milošević P; Jurjević Z; Erdeljac E
Acta Clin Croat; 2022 Feb; 60(3):457-466. PubMed ID: 35282499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography.
Bartlett ES; Walters TD; Symons SP; Fox AJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Mar; 27(3):632-7. PubMed ID: 16552007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque morphology (geometry and tissue composition) using computed tomography angiography.
Chrencik MT; Khan AA; Luther L; Anthony L; Yokemick J; Patel J; Sorkin JD; Sikdar S; Lal BK
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Sep; 70(3):858-868. PubMed ID: 30850296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between quantification methods of carotid artery stenosis and computed tomographic angiography.
Saba L; Mallarini G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 20498548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-sectional area for the calculation of carotid artery stenosis on computed tomographic angiography.
Carnicelli AP; Stone JJ; Doyle A; Chowdhry AK; Mix D; Ellis J; Gillespie DL; Chandra A
J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):659-65. PubMed ID: 23611710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
Leclerc X; Godefroy O; Pruvo JP; Leys D
Stroke; 1995 Sep; 26(9):1577-81. PubMed ID: 7660401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography].
Yasuda E; Miyati T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 21532247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement.
van Prehn J; Muhs BE; Pramanik B; Ollenschleger M; Rockman CB; Cayne NS; Adelman MA; Jacobowitz GR; Maldonado TS
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 36(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18585935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NASCET percent stenosis semi-automated versus manual measurement on CTA.
Lian K; White JH; Bartlett ES; Bharatha A; Aviv RI; Fox AJ; Symons SP
Can J Neurol Sci; 2012 May; 39(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 22547515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis on MR Angiography.
Baradaran H; Patel P; Gialdini G; Al-Dasuqi K; Giambrone A; Kamel H; Gupta A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 May; 38(5):986-990. PubMed ID: 28302605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grading of carotid artery stenosis with computed tomography angiography: whether to use the narrowest diameter or the cross-sectional area.
Samarzija K; Milosevic P; Jurjevic Z; Erdeljac E
Insights Imaging; 2018 Aug; 9(4):527-534. PubMed ID: 29799095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity.
Wise SW; Hopper KD; Ten Have T; Schwartz T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Apr; 170(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 9530034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
