324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16552131)
1. [Use of algal indicators (diatoms) for monitoring rivers].
Ciutti F
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):393-7. PubMed ID: 16552131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of diatom biotic indices in the Guadalquivir River Basin, a Mediterranean basin. Which one is the most appropriated?
Martín G; Toja J; Sala SE; de los Reyes Fernández M; Reyes I; Adela Casco M
Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Nov; 170(1-4):519-34. PubMed ID: 20072812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of water chemistry and benthic diatom communities for qualification of a polluted tropical river in Costa Rica.
Silva-Benavides AM
Rev Biol Trop; 1996 Aug; 44(2A):395-416. PubMed ID: 9246365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Water quality assessment of rivers using diatom metrics across Mediterranean Europe: a methods intercalibration exercise.
Almeida SF; Elias C; Ferreira J; Tornés E; Puccinelli C; Delmas F; Dörflinger G; Urbanič G; Marcheggiani S; Rosebery J; Mancini L; Sabater S
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Apr; 476-477():768-76. PubMed ID: 24342490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linking diatom community structure to pesticide input as evaluated through a spatial contamination potential (Phytopixal): a case study in the Neste river system (South-West France).
Morin S; Bottin M; Mazzella N; Macary F; Delmas F; Winterton P; Coste M
Aquat Toxicol; 2009 Aug; 94(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 19535156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using diatom indices for water quality assessment in a subtropical river, China.
Tan X; Sheldon F; Bunn SE; Zhang Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Jun; 20(6):4164-75. PubMed ID: 23247517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Water quality indices across Europe--a comparison of the good ecological status of five river basins.
von der Ohe PC; Prüss A; Schäfer RB; Liess M; de Deckere E; Brack W
J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):970-8. PubMed ID: 17726558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A revisitation of TRIX for trophic status assessment in the light of the European Water Framework Directive: application to Italian coastal waters.
Pettine M; Casentini B; Fazi S; Giovanardi F; Pagnotta R
Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1413-26. PubMed ID: 17618654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Achieving quality goals for bodies of water].
Cencetti C; Guidi M; Martinelli A; Patrizi G
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 16552118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some aspects of water quality in a polluted lowland river in relation to the intracellular chemical levels in planktonic and epilithic diatoms.
Tien CJ
Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1779-90. PubMed ID: 15026232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are biotic indices sensitive to river toxicants? A comparison of metrics based on diatoms and macro-invertebrates.
Blanco S; Bécares E
Chemosphere; 2010 Mar; 79(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 20163819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of freshwater periphytic diatoms to agricultural herbicides.
Debenest T; Pinelli E; Coste M; Silvestre J; Mazzella N; Madigou C; Delmas F
Aquat Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 93(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19342109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Water quality characteristics of forest rivers around Lake Biwa.
Fujii S; Somiya I; Nagare H; Serizawa S
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(5):183-92. PubMed ID: 11379131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active bio-monitoring of contamination in aquatic systems--an in situ translocation experiment applying the PICT concept.
Rotter S; Sans-Piché F; Streck G; Altenburger R; Schmitt-Jansen M
Aquat Toxicol; 2011 Jan; 101(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 21087798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a holistic and risk-based management of European river basins.
Brack W; Apitz SE; Borchardt D; Brils J; Cardoso AC; Foekema EM; van Gils J; Jansen S; Harris B; Hein M; Heise S; Hellsten S; de Maagd PG; Müller D; Panov VE; Posthuma L; Quevauviller P; Verdonschot PF; von der Ohe PC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 19132820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations of periphytic diatom sensitivity to the herbicide diuron and relation to species distribution in a contamination gradient: implications for biomonitoring.
Roubeix V; Mazzella N; Schouler L; Fauvelle V; Morin S; Coste M; Delmas F; Margoum C
J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 21547308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The monitoring of watercourses on the basis of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/CE. An integrated methodological approach applied to the appenninici rivers. First data].
Scuri S; Grappasonni I; Petrelli F; Celestino A; Cocchioni M
Ann Ig; 2009; 21(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 19798911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Water matrices samples: pre-concentration problems and methodologies for ecotoxicological assessment of fresh waters].
Galassi S
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 16552130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Water and suspended matter sampling in fresh water networks].
Galas C; Stellato L; Barbizzi S; Belli M; Sansone U
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 16552125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design of a new monitoring network and first testing of new biological assessment methods according to water framework directive.
Sommerhäuser M; Scharner C; Schimmer H; Schindler A; Plantikow K; Vietoris F
J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):966-9. PubMed ID: 17726557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
