These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16552199)
1. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Link RE; Bhayani SB; Kavoussi LR Ann Surg; 2006 Apr; 243(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 16552199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complete daVinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis. Bhayani SB; Link RE; Varkarakis JM; Kavoussi LR J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15865522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China. Hong P; Ding G; Zhu D; Yang K; Pan J; Li X; Chen Z; Zhang L; Tang Q; Hao H; Zhou Z; Zhou L Urol Int; 2018; 101(3):337-344. PubMed ID: 30231235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus robotic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a series of 60 cases performed by a single surgeon. Hemal AK; Mukherjee S; Singh K Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):5012-6. PubMed ID: 20156381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms. Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty]. Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty. Varda BK; Johnson EK; Clark C; Chung BI; Nelson CP; Chang SL J Urol; 2014 Apr; 191(4):1090-5. PubMed ID: 24513164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome. Singh I; Hemal AK Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study. Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial. Penn HA; Gatti JM; Hoestje SM; DeMarco RT; Snyder CL; Murphy JP J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):690-5. PubMed ID: 20639039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]