178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16552250)
1. Diagnosing glaucoma progression: current practice and promising technologies.
Giangiacomo A; Garway-Heath D; Caprioli J
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 16552250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glaucoma screening: current trends, economic issues, technology, and challenges.
Nduaguba C; Lee RK
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 16552249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Jampel HD; Singh K; Lin SC; Chen TC; Francis BA; Hodapp E; Samples JR; Smith SD
Ophthalmology; 2011 May; 118(5):986-1002. PubMed ID: 21539982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostic approaches for early detection of glaucoma progression].
Arend KO; Plange N
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Mar; 223(3):194-216. PubMed ID: 16552653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased Long-term measurement variability with scanning laser polarimetry employing enhanced corneal compensation: an early sign of glaucoma progression.
Tóth M; Holló G
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):571-7. PubMed ID: 18854736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage.
Sihota R; Sony P; Gupta V; Dada T; Singh R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):2006-10. PubMed ID: 16639009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain OCT.
Horn FK; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Baleanu D; Juenemann AM; Kruse FE; Tornow RP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):1971-7. PubMed ID: 19151389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The challenges of monitoring glaucoma progression.
Termote K; Zeyen T
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2010; (314):25-32. PubMed ID: 20480748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optic disc and visual field changes after trabeculectomy.
Kotecha A; Spratt A; Bunce C; Garway-Heath DF; Khaw PT; Viswanathan A;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):4693-9. PubMed ID: 19474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New developments in scanning laser polarimetry for glaucoma.
Lemij HG; Reus NJ
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 18301287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression.
Gardiner SK; Crabb DP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1400-7. PubMed ID: 11980853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of glaucoma imaging technology.
Azuara-Blanco A; Burr JM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1266-7; author reply 1267-8. PubMed ID: 18598824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Modern diagnostic methods for suspected glaucoma and glaucoma].
Vass C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Apr; 221(4):227-46. PubMed ID: 15118952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New developments in optical coherence tomography for glaucoma.
Chang R; Budenz DL
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 18301286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is scanning laser polarimetry ready for clinical practice?
Weinreb RN; Medeiros FA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):674-6. PubMed ID: 17386273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and optical coherence tomography in tilted disk.
Yu S; Tanabe T; Hangai M; Morishita S; Kurimoto Y; Yoshimura N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Sep; 142(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 16935594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of mean deviation with AGIS and CIGTS scores in association with structural parameters in glaucomatous eyes.
Naka M; Kanamori A; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Negi A
J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19525728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
