These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16553059)

  • 1. Individual perception of noise exposure and hearing protection in industry.
    Arezes PM; Miguel AS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):683-92. PubMed ID: 16553059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of Hearing Protection Use Among Industrial Workers.
    Tantranont K; Codchanak N
    Workplace Health Saf; 2017 Aug; 65(8):365-371. PubMed ID: 28422611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of the adjustment of retrospective noise exposure for use of hearing protection devices.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 20237208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.
    Reddy RK; Welch D; Thorne P; Ameratunga S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):202-9. PubMed ID: 22918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of the hearing protection assessment (HPA-2) questionnaire.
    Reddy R; Welch D; Ameratunga S; Thorne P
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Apr; 64(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 24514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of an intervention to increase construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Hong OS; Ronis DL; Eakin BL; Kerr MJ; Early MR
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 10665215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers.
    Lusk SL; Kerr MJ; Kauffman SA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Jul; 59(7):466-70. PubMed ID: 9697294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception and attitudes of firefighters on noise exposure and hearing loss.
    Hong O; Samo D; Hulea R; Eakin B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 18213534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.
    Edelson J; Neitzel R; Meischke H; Daniell W; Sheppard L; Stover B; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Aug; 53(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 19531807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise exposure of workers and the use of hearing protection equipment in New Zealand.
    John GW; Grynevych A; Welch D; McBride D; Thorne PR
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2014; 69(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 24205958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kazanis AS; Eakin BL; Hong O; Raymond DM
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 14501543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.
    Kerr MJ; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11984380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing protection devices: Use at work predicts use at play.
    Beach EF; Gilliver M; Williams W
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2016 Sep; 71(5):281-288. PubMed ID: 26927729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
    Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
    AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
    Hager LD
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kerr MJ; Atwood JR
    Nurs Res; 1994; 43(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8183656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.