These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16553066)

  • 21. Display signaling in augmented reality: effects of cue reliability and image realism on attention allocation and trust calibration.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 11866192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical information displays to improve ICU outcomes.
    Effken JA; Loeb RG; Kang Y; Lin ZC
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Nov; 77(11):765-77. PubMed ID: 18639487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.
    Rovira E; McGarry K; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 17315845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The design of a visual display for the presentation of statistical quality control information to operators on the plant floor.
    D'Souza ME; Greenstein JS
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 10774132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implications of graphics enhancements for the visualization of scientific data: dimensional integrality, stereopsis, motion, and mesh.
    Wickens CD; Merwin DH; Lin EL
    Hum Factors; 1994 Mar; 36(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 8026843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Objects and mappings: incompatible principles of display design - a critique of Marino and Mahan.
    Bennett KB
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):131-7; discussion 138-40. PubMed ID: 15960092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of various graphical and numeric trend display formats on the detection of simulated changes.
    Kennedy RR; Merry AF; Warman GR; Webster CS
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Nov; 64(11):1186-91. PubMed ID: 19825052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reshaping the laboratory results presentation layer: three interfaces for handheld devices.
    Ehrler F; Brissaud M; Wipfli R; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():660-2. PubMed ID: 25991231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling the cognitive content of displays.
    Chechile RA; Eggleston RG; Fleischman RN; Sasseville AM
    Hum Factors; 1989 Feb; 31(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 2707817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring.
    Jungk A; Thull B; Hoeft A; Rau G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Dec; 15(7-8):469-79. PubMed ID: 12578045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Scherer AM; Witteman HO; Solomon JB; Exe NL; Tarini BA; Fagerlin A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 May; 24(3):520-528. PubMed ID: 28040686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Managing and displaying different time granularities of clinical information.
    Combi C; Pinciroli F; Musazzi G; Ponti C
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():954-8. PubMed ID: 7950065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physicians' perception of alternative displays of clinical research evidence for clinical decision support - A study with case vignettes.
    Slager SL; Weir CR; Kim H; Mostafa J; Del Fiol G
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Jul; 71S():S53-S59. PubMed ID: 28089913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A graphical object display improves anesthesiologists' performance on a simulated diagnostic task.
    Blike GT; Surgenor SD; Whalen K
    J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Jan; 15(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 12578060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distributed representation as a principle for the analysis of cockpit information displays.
    Zhang J
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1997; 7(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 11541073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view.
    Barfield W; Rosenberg C; Furness TA 3rd
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(3):233-56. PubMed ID: 11541915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Synthetic vision systems: the effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view.
    Alexander AL; Wickens CD; Hardy TJ
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):693-707. PubMed ID: 16553060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Metaphor graphics to support integrated decision making with respiratory data.
    Cole WG; Stewart JG
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1993 May; 10(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8366316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.