BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16553185)

  • 21. No increased risk for cervical cancer after a broader definition of a negative Pap smear.
    Rebolj M; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade F; Looman C; Boer R; Habbema JD
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Dec; 123(11):2632-5. PubMed ID: 18767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cytological screening for precancerous lesions of the cervix.
    Sng I
    Singapore Med J; 1987 Oct; 28(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 3433107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ.
    Morrison BJ; Coldman AJ; Boyes DA; Anderson GH
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Sep; 74(5):814-9. PubMed ID: 8795587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. HPV testing and visual inspection for cervical cancer screening in resource-poor regions.
    Jeronimo J; Castle PE; Herrero R; Burk RD; Schiffman M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Dec; 83(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 14643047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cytologically diagnosed Gardnerella vaginalis infection and cervical (pre)neoplasia as established in population-based cervical screening.
    Klomp JM; Boon ME; Van Haaften M; Heintz AP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 199(5):480.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18565490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is it relevant to screen women younger than 26 years for precancerous and malignant cervical lesions ?
    Ghosh A; Rao S; Pramanik T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 16101318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
    Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for Cervical Cancer Among Low-Risk Populations: Orthodox Jewish Women as a Model.
    Caspi R; Schejter E; Groutz A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jul; 25(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 26599257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
    Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
    PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oncogenic human papilloma virus and cervical pre-cancerous lesions in brothel-based sex workers in India.
    Sarkar K; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharyya S; Chatterjee S; Mallick AH; Chakraborti S; Chatterjee D; Bal B
    J Infect Public Health; 2008; 1(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 20701853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Population-based prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology findings and local risk factors in Ibadan, Nigeria: implications for cervical cancer control programs and human papilloma virus immunization.
    Thomas JO; Ojemakinde KO; Ajayi IO; Omigbodun AO; Fawole OI; Oladepo O
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 22555526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
    Rosenfeld JA
    Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Cardiff Cervical Cytology Study: prevalence of cytological grades and initial histological findings.
    Evans DM; Hibbard BM; Jones JM; Sweetnam P
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Feb; 282(6265):689-91. PubMed ID: 6781617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prevalence and risk factors for human papillomavirus DNA in cervical cytology.
    Kasap B; Yetimalar H; Keklik A; Yildiz A; Cukurova K; Soylu F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):168-71. PubMed ID: 21764503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of nonscreening smears on screening smear results: a statistical analysis with its implications for the NHS cervical screening programme.
    Rice S; Slater DN; Hewer EM
    Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 10877275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality improvement project in cervical cancer screening: practical measures for monitoring laboratory performance.
    Tarkkanen J; Geagea A; Nieminen P; Anttila A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jan; 82(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 12580846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.