117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16553260)
1. [Prospects of adjusted clinical groups (ACG's) in capitated payment risk adjustment].
Sicras-Mainar A; Serrat-Tarrés J; Navarro-Artieda R; Llopart-López J
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2006; 80(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 16553260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Measurement of relative cost weights as an effect of the retrospective application of adjusted clinical groups in primary care].
Sicras-Mainar A; Serrat-Tarrés J
Gac Sanit; 2006; 20(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16753090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obtaining the mean relative weights of the cost of care in Catalonia (Spain): retrospective application of the adjusted clinical groups case-mix system in primary health care.
Sicras-Mainar A; Velasco-Velasco S; Navarro-Artieda R; Aguado Jodar A; Plana-Ripoll O; Hermosilla-Pérez E; Bolibar-Ribas B; Prados-Torres A; Violan-Fors C
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Apr; 19(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 22458780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Adjusted clinical groups use at a Spanish primary care center: a retrospective, population-based study].
Sicras-Mainar A; Pané-Mena O; Martínez-Ruíz T; Fernández-Roure JL; Prats-Sánchez J; Santafé L; Navarro-Artieda R; Prados-Torres A; Estelrich-Bennasar J
Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2010 Jan; 27(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20209232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between effectiveness and costs measured by a risk-adjusted case-mix system: multicentre study of Catalonian population data bases.
Sicras-Mainar A; Navarro-Artieda R; Blanca-Tamayo M; Velasco-Velasco S; Escribano-Herranz E; Llopart-López JR; Violan-Fors C; Vilaseca-Llobet JM; Sánchez-Fontcuberta E; Benavent-Areu J; Flor-Serra F; Aguado-Jodar A; Rodríguez-López D; Prados-Torres A; Estelrich-Bennasar J
BMC Public Health; 2009 Jun; 9():202. PubMed ID: 19555475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Levels Of Capitation Payments Needed To Shift Primary Care Toward Proactive Team And Nonvisit Care.
Basu S; Phillips RS; Song Z; Bitton A; Landon BE
Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Sep; 36(9):1599-1605. PubMed ID: 28874487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of comorbidity in analysing patient costs in Swedish primary care.
Engström SG; Carlsson L; Ostgren CJ; Nilsson GH; Borgquist LA
BMC Public Health; 2006 Feb; 6():36. PubMed ID: 16483369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Keep it simple? Predicting primary health care costs with clinical morbidity measures.
Brilleman SL; Gravelle H; Hollinghurst S; Purdy S; Salisbury C; Windmeijer F
J Health Econ; 2014 May; 35(100):109-22. PubMed ID: 24657375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-adjustment methods for all-payer comparative performance reporting in Vermont.
Finison K; Mohlman M; Jones C; Pinette M; Jorgenson D; Kinner A; Tremblay T; Gottlieb D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28103923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs): a classification system for risk-adjusted capitation-based payment and health care management.
Hughes JS; Averill RF; Eisenhandler J; Goldfield NI; Muldoon J; Neff JM; Gay JC
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 14713742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of medical group practice and physician payment methods on costs of care.
Kralewski JE; Rich EC; Feldman R; Dowd BE; Bernhardt T; Johnson C; Gold W
Health Serv Res; 2000 Aug; 35(3):591-613. PubMed ID: 10966087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in prescription drug expenditures explained by adjusted clinical groups (ACG) case-mix: a cross-sectional study of patient electronic records in primary care.
Aguado A; Guinó E; Mukherjee B; Sicras A; Serrat J; Acedo M; Ferro JJ; Moreno V
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Mar; 8():53. PubMed ID: 18318912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The current state of risk adjustment technology for capitation.
Ingber MJ
J Ambul Care Manage; 1998 Oct; 21(4):1-28. PubMed ID: 10387435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A case-mix classification system for explaining healthcare costs using administrative data in Italy.
Corti MC; Avossa F; Schievano E; Gallina P; Ferroni E; Alba N; Dotto M; Basso C; Netti ST; Fedeli U; Mantoan D
Eur J Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 54():13-16. PubMed ID: 29514743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of diagnosis-based risk adjustment measures in a population of sick Australians.
Duckett SJ; Agius PA
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 26(6):500-7. PubMed ID: 12530791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-minimizing risk adjustment.
Shen Y; Ellis RP
J Health Econ; 2002 May; 21(3):515-30. PubMed ID: 12022271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Academic health systems management: the rationale behind capitated contracts.
Taheri PA; Butz DA; Greenfield LJ
Ann Surg; 2000 Jun; 231(6):849-59. PubMed ID: 10816628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a risk-adjusted capitation model based on principal inpatient diagnoses in Taiwan.
Lin W; Chang RE; Hsieh CJ; Yaung CL; Chiang TL
J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Sep; 102(9):637-43. PubMed ID: 14625609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Capitated payments to primary care providers and the delivery of patient education.
Pearson WS; King DE; Richards C
J Am Board Fam Med; 2013; 26(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 23833148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
