179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16553755)
1. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
Gethin G; Cowman S
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the size of ulcers by planimetry: a useful method in the clinical setting.
Oien RF; Håkansson A; Hansen BU; Bjellerup M
J Wound Care; 2002 May; 11(5):165-8. PubMed ID: 12055939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study.
Etris MB; Pribble J; LaBrecque J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 7546090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice.
Flanagan M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Oct; 49(10):28-40. PubMed ID: 14652419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements.
Cutler NR; George R; Seifert RD; Brunelle R; Sramek JJ; McNeill K; Boyd WM
Decubitus; 1993 Nov; 6(6):22-30. PubMed ID: 8286024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of venous leg ulcers with a laser-based three-dimensional method: comparison to computer planimetry with photography.
Kecelj-Leskovec N; Jezersek M; Mozina J; Pavlović MD; Lunder T
Wound Repair Regen; 2007; 15(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 17971024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The healing wound: a comparison of three clinically useful methods of measurement.
Thomas AC; Wysocki AB
Decubitus; 1990 Feb; 3(1):18-20, 24-5. PubMed ID: 2322408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
Foltynski P
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wound shape geometry measurements correlate to eventual wound healing.
Cardinal M; Eisenbud DE; Armstrong DG
Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19320884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Leading wound care technology: The ARANZ medical silhouette.
Kieser DC; Hammond C
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Feb; 24(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 21242735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
