BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16555306)

  • 1. De novo ligand design to an ensemble of protein structures.
    Todorov NP; Buenemann CL; Alberts IL
    Proteins; 2006 Jul; 64(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 16555306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking.
    Alberts IL; Todorov NP; Dean PM
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6585-96. PubMed ID: 16220975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure-based ligand design by dynamically assembling molecular building blocks at binding site.
    Liu H; Duan Z; Luo Q; Shi Y
    Proteins; 1999 Sep; 36(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 10450088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring experimental sources of multiple protein conformations in structure-based drug design.
    Damm KL; Carlson HA
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Jul; 129(26):8225-35. PubMed ID: 17555316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer design of bioactive molecules: a method for receptor-based de novo ligand design.
    Moon JB; Howe WJ
    Proteins; 1991; 11(4):314-28. PubMed ID: 1758885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An automated method for dynamic ligand design.
    Miranker A; Karplus M
    Proteins; 1995 Dec; 23(4):472-90. PubMed ID: 8749844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating protein flexibility in structure-based drug discovery: using HIV-1 protease as a test case.
    Meagher KL; Carlson HA
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Oct; 126(41):13276-81. PubMed ID: 15479081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural parameterization of the binding enthalpy of small ligands.
    Luque I; Freire E
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 12210999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of water molecules in protein binding sites.
    Barillari C; Taylor J; Viner R; Essex JW
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Mar; 129(9):2577-87. PubMed ID: 17288418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receptor flexibility in the in silico screening of reagents in the S1' pocket of human collagenase.
    Källblad P; Todorov NP; Willems HM; Alberts IL
    J Med Chem; 2004 May; 47(11):2761-7. PubMed ID: 15139754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binding pathways of ligands to HIV-1 protease: coarse-grained and atomistic simulations.
    Chang CE; Trylska J; Tozzini V; McCammon JA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Jan; 69(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17313452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragment-Based flexible ligand docking by evolutionary optimization.
    Budin N; Majeux N; Caflisch A
    Biol Chem; 2001 Sep; 382(9):1365-72. PubMed ID: 11688719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CONCERTS: dynamic connection of fragments as an approach to de novo ligand design.
    Pearlman DA; Murcko MA
    J Med Chem; 1996 Apr; 39(8):1651-63. PubMed ID: 8648605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures.
    Knegtel RM; Kuntz ID; Oshiro CM
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Feb; 266(2):424-40. PubMed ID: 9047373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generation of receptor structural ensembles for virtual screening using binding site shape analysis and clustering.
    Osguthorpe DJ; Sherman W; Hagler AT
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2012 Aug; 80(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 22515569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binding free energy contributions of interfacial waters in HIV-1 protease/inhibitor complexes.
    Lu Y; Yang CY; Wang S
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Sep; 128(36):11830-9. PubMed ID: 16953623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization and computational evaluation of a series of potential active site inhibitors of the V82F/I84V drug-resistant mutant of HIV-1 protease: an application of the relaxed complex method of structure-based drug design.
    Perryman AL; Lin JH; Andrew McCammon J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2006 May; 67(5):336-45. PubMed ID: 16784458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibitor binding at the protein interface in crystals of a HIV-1 protease complex.
    Brynda J; Rezácová P; Fábry M; Horejsí M; Stouracová R; Soucek M; Hradílek M; Konvalinka J; Sedlácek J
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2004 Nov; 60(Pt 11):1943-8. PubMed ID: 15502300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.