These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16556501)

  • 41. A comparison of cellular irradiation techniques with alpha particles using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit.
    Incerti S; Gault N; Habchi C; Lefaix JL; Moretto P; Poncy JL; Pouthier T; Seznec H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17132663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Monte Carlo methods and techniques status and prospects for future evolution.
    Vaz P
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):536-41. PubMed ID: 19942445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans.
    Pisaturo O; Moeckli R; Mirimanoff RO; Bochud FO
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4299-310. PubMed ID: 19531844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surface and build-up region dose analysis for clinical radiotherapy photon beams.
    Ishmael Parsai E; Shvydka D; Pearson D; Gopalakrishnan M; Feldmeier JJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1438-42. PubMed ID: 18434173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Tenth value layers for 60Co gamma rays and for 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV x rays in concrete for beams of cone angles between 0 degrees and 14 degrees calculated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Jaradat AK; Biggs PJ
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 17429304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the future of Monte Carlo simulation for nuclear logs.
    Gardner RP; Sood A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):932-5. PubMed ID: 19897380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Benchmark of penelope for low and medium energy X-rays.
    Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 18495512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Monte-Carlo calculations of particle fluences and neutron effective dose rates in the atmosphere.
    Matthiä D; Sihver L; Meier M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 18448435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Neutron spectrometry around the VENUS reactor using Monte Carlo simulations and Bonner spheres measurements.
    Coeck M; Lacoste V; Muller H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):170-4. PubMed ID: 17573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Calculation of coincidence summing corrections for X-ray peaks and for sum peaks with X-ray contributions.
    Arnold D; Sima O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1297-302. PubMed ID: 16678431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimation of the uncertainty in internal dose calculation for two contamination cases.
    Blanchardon E; Molokanov A; Franck D; Kochetkov O; Panfilov A; Jourdain JR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):548-52. PubMed ID: 17237182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Standardisation of 124SB and 152EU using software coincidence counting system.
    Havelka M; Sochorová J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(7-8):1330-4. PubMed ID: 20079656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A numerical analysis method for evaluating rod lenses using the Monte Carlo method.
    Yoshida S; Horiuchi S; Ushiyama Z; Yamamoto M
    Opt Express; 2010 Dec; 18(26):27016-27. PubMed ID: 21196978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements.
    Etherington G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation transport calculations and simulations.
    Fassò A; Ferrari A; Sala PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Nov; 137(1-2):118-33. PubMed ID: 19778934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.
    Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Simulation of photon energy spectra from Varian 2100C and 2300C/D Linacs: simplified estimates with PENELOPE Monte Carlo models.
    Baumgartner A; Steurer A; Maringer FJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2007-12. PubMed ID: 19692253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.