441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16557131)
1. Biomechanical comparison of flexible stainless steel and titanium nails with external fixation using a femur fracture model.
Mani US; Sabatino CT; Sabharwal S; Svach DJ; Suslak A; Behrens FF
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 16557131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of titanium elastic nail fixation in a pediatric femur fracture model.
Li Y; Stabile KJ; Shilt JS
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Dec; 28(8):874-8. PubMed ID: 19034181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computational evaluation of the effect of intramedullary nail material properties on the stabilization of simulated femoral shaft fractures.
Perez A; Mahar A; Negus C; Newton P; Impelluso T
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 17905637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the extent of prebending affect the stability of femoral shaft fractures stabilized by titanium elastic nails? A biomechanical investigation on an adolescent femur model.
Doser A; Helwig P; Konstantinidis L; Kuminack KF; Südkamp NP; Strohm PC
J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Dec; 31(8):834-8. PubMed ID: 22101660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis comparing titanium elastic nails with locked plating in two simulated pediatric femur fracture models.
Porter SE; Booker GR; Parsell DE; Weber MD; Russell GV; Woodall J; Wagner M; Neubauer T
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 22892620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antegrade versus retrograde titanium elastic nail fixation of pediatric distal-third femoral-shaft fractures: a mechanical study.
Mehlman CT; Nemeth NM; Glos DL
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Oct; 20(9):608-12. PubMed ID: 17088662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femur spiral fracture model: Influence of different materials on the stiffness in flexible intramedullary nailing.
Kaiser MM; Wessel LM; Zachert G; Stratmann C; Eggert R; Gros N; Schulze-Hessing M; Kienast B; Rapp M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jul; 26(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 21345557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation.
Beingessner D; Moon E; Barei D; Morshed S
J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 21610539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical properties of different combinations of flexible nails in a model of a pediatric femoral fracture.
Kiely N
J Pediatr Orthop; 2002; 22(4):424-7. PubMed ID: 12131434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical study on flexible intramedullary nails used to treat pediatric femoral fractures.
Green JK; Werner FW; Dhawan R; Evans PJ; Kelley S; Webster DA
J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1315-20. PubMed ID: 15961268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications of titanium and stainless steel elastic nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures.
Wall EJ; Jain V; Vora V; Mehlman CT; Crawford AH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1305-13. PubMed ID: 18519325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Analysis of Retrograde Flexible Intramedullary Nail Constructs in a Simulated Pediatric Femur Fracture Model.
Bland DC; Black SR; Pierce WA; Wimberly RL; Riccio AI
J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Jan; 39(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 28141692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ender nail fixation of pediatric femur fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Lee SS; Mahar AT; Newton PO
J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(4):442-5. PubMed ID: 11433153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical characterization of external fixator stiffness for a rat femoral fracture model.
Willie B; Adkins K; Zheng X; Simon U; Claes L
J Orthop Res; 2009 May; 27(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 18985701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of stainless steel and titanium nails for fixation of simulated femoral fractures.
Mahar AT; Lee SS; Lalonde FD; Impelluso T; Newton PO
J Pediatr Orthop; 2004; 24(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 15502562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in paediatric femur and tibia shaft fractures: Comparison between titanium and stainless steel nails.
Marengo L; Nasto LA; Michelis MB; Boero S
Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S8-S11. PubMed ID: 30415674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical performance of flexible intramedullary nails with end caps tested in distal segmental defects of pediatric femur models.
Volpon JB; Perina MM; Okubo R; Maranho DA
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 22706460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of retrograde intramedullary stabilization for femoral fractures: the effect of fracture level.
Goodwin R; Mahar AT; Oka R; Steinman S; Newton PO
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Dec; 27(8):873-6. PubMed ID: 18209606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis.
Kandemir U; Augat P; Konowalczyk S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Schmidt U
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Aug; 31(8):e241-e246. PubMed ID: 28394844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
