106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16557205)
21. Benign nonphysiologic lesions with increased 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT: characterization and incidence.
Metser U; Miller E; Lerman H; Even-Sapir E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1203-10. PubMed ID: 17954662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Utility of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Zuijdwijk MD; Vogel WV; Corstens FH; Oyen WJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 18528186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Role of FDG-PET in the assessment of survival prognosis in melanoma.
Pleiss C; Risse JH; Biersack HJ; Bender H
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2007 Dec; 22(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 18158764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. FDG PET and tumour markers in the diagnosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.
Siggelkow W; Rath W; Buell U; Zimny M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():S118-24. PubMed ID: 15146295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of PET/CT in comparison with same day contrast enhanced CT in breast cancer management.
Piperkova E; Raphael B; Altinyay ME; Castellon I; Libes R; Sandella N; Heiba S; Abdel-Dayem H
Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Jun; 32(6):429-34. PubMed ID: 17515747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 18F-FDG PET scanning correlates with tissue markers of poor prognosis and predicts mortality for patients after liver resection for colorectal metastases.
Riedl CC; Akhurst T; Larson S; Stanziale SF; Tuorto S; Bhargava A; Hricak H; Klimstra D; Fong Y
J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):771-5. PubMed ID: 17475966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: prognostic implications.
Choi JY; Jang HJ; Shim YM; Kim K; Lee KS; Lee KH; Choi Y; Choe YS; Kim BT
J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1843-50. PubMed ID: 15534053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study.
Scott AM; Gunawardana DH; Kelley B; Stuckey JG; Byrne AJ; Ramshaw JE; Fulham MJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 49(9):1451-7. PubMed ID: 18703607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CA 15.3 measurements for separating FDG PET/CT positive from negative findings in breast carcinoma recurrence. Factors influencing the area under the ROC curve.
Kruse V; Van de Wiele C; Borms M; Maes A; Pottel H; Sathekge M; Cocquyt V
Nuklearmedizin; 2014 Aug; 53(4):131-8. PubMed ID: 25100557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in women with breast cancer.
Landheer ML; Steffens MG; Klinkenbijl JH; Westenberg AH; Oyen WJ
Br J Surg; 2005 Nov; 92(11):1363-7. PubMed ID: 16187254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on management of patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle.
Mertens LS; Fioole-Bruining A; Vegt E; Vogel WV; van Rhijn BW; Horenblas S
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 23790129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Yen RF; Hong RL; Tzen KY; Pan MH; Chen TH
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):770-4. PubMed ID: 15872349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective comparison of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with conventional assessment by computed tomography scans and serum tumor markers for the evaluation of residual masses in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell carcinoma.
Kollmannsberger C; Oechsle K; Dohmen BM; Pfannenberg A; Bares R; Claussen CD; Kanz L; Bokemeyer C
Cancer; 2002 May; 94(9):2353-62. PubMed ID: 12015760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Gayed I; Vu T; Iyer R; Johnson M; Macapinlac H; Swanston N; Podoloff D
J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 14734662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. (18)F-FDG PET/CT-positive internal mammary lymph nodes: pathologic correlation by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and assessment of associated risk factors.
Wang CL; Eissa MJ; Rogers JV; Aravkin AY; Porter BA; Beatty JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1138-44. PubMed ID: 23617501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic value of [18F]FDG-PET imaging in small cell lung cancer.
Pandit N; Gonen M; Krug L; Larson SM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 12483413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer in comparison with 18F-NaF PET/CT.
Piccardo A; Puntoni M; Morbelli S; Massollo M; Bongioanni F; Paparo F; Altrinetti V; Gonella R; Gennari A; Iacozzi M; Sambuceti G; DeCensi A
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(4):163-72. PubMed ID: 26165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of the treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal tract lymphomas.
Kumar R; Xiu Y; Potenta S; Mavi A; Zhuang H; Yu JQ; Dhurairaj T; Dadparvar S; Alavi A
J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1796-803. PubMed ID: 15534046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. FDG PET-CT in the management of primary breast lymphoma.
Santra A; Kumar R; Reddy R; Halanaik D; Kumar R; Bal CS; Malhotra A
Clin Nucl Med; 2009 Dec; 34(12):848-53. PubMed ID: 20139815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
