114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16557367)
1. Migration of two different cementless hip arthroplasty stems in combination with two different heads: a biomechanical in vitro study.
Klestil T; Morlock MM; Schwieger K; Sellenschloh K; Curda B; Biedermann R; Hennerbichler A; Schmoelz W; Rabl W; Blauth M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Aug; 126(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 16557367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
Cech O; Dzupa V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Widmer KH; Majewski M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of stem size on clinical outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty with cementless extensively porous-coated femoral components.
Engh CA; Mohan V; Nagowski JP; Sychterz Terefenko CJ; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 18534449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do unloading periods affect migration characteristics of cemented femoral components? An in vitro evaluation with the Exeter stem.
Verdonschot N; Barink M; Stolk J; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop Belg; 2002 Oct; 68(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 12415936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of the cementless ALLOCLASSIC hip arthroplasty system using a 28-mm ceramic head: with a retrospective comparison to a 32-mm head.
Pieringer H; Auersperg V; Böhler N
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):967-74. PubMed ID: 17027538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation.
Ko BH; Yoon YS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):996-1003. PubMed ID: 18550233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stem curvature and load angle influence the initial relative bone-implant motion of cementless femoral stems.
Berzins A; Sumner DR; Andriacchi TP; Galante JO
J Orthop Res; 1993 Sep; 11(5):758-69. PubMed ID: 8410476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Biomechanical experiment of non-stemmed anatomical total hip prosthesis arthroplasty in vitro].
Fei Q; Hong S; Chen T; Chen Z; Qian B
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 15762127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neck-modular femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty.
Goyal N; Hozack WJ
Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():309-13. PubMed ID: 21082579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
