These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16557619)

  • 1. Assessing the "evolving standards of decency:" perceptions of capital punishment for juveniles.
    Kalbeitzer R; Goldstein NE
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 16557619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
    Siegel DM
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
    Herbert PB; Meyers JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.
    Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death?
    Edens JF; Colwell LH; Desforges DM; Fernandez K
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(5):603-25. PubMed ID: 16170787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improbable predictions at capital sentencing: contrasting prison violence outcomes.
    Cunningham MD; Sorensen JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 20305077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No sympathy for the devil: attributing psychopathic traits to capital murderers also predicts support for executing them.
    Edens JF; Davis KM; Fernandez Smith K; Guy LS
    Personal Disord; 2013 Apr; 4(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 22452773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. But he knew it was wrong: evaluating adolescent culpability.
    Ash P
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 22396338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
    Semple JK; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
    Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of insanity based on occupation of defendant and seriousness of crime.
    McGraw SL; Foley LA
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Feb; 86(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 10778266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life and death in the Lone Star State: three decades of violence predictions by capital juries.
    Cunningham MD; Sorensen JR; Vigen MP; Woods SO
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 21105010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The guilty mind and criminal sentencing: integrating legal and empirical inquiry as illustrated by capital sentencing.
    Schopp RF; Patry MW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):631-51. PubMed ID: 14502693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life imprisonment: recent issues in national and international law.
    van Zyl Smit D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(5):405-21. PubMed ID: 16784776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.