BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16557643)

  • 41. How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
    Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22775304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Depression in jailed women defendants and its relationship to their adjudicative competence.
    Redding RE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 9148887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 18086744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data.
    Rogers R; Grandjean N; Tillbrook CE; Vitacco MJ; Sewell KW
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):503-18. PubMed ID: 11568958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
    Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Correlates of adjudicative competence among psychiatrically impaired juveniles.
    Warren JI; Aaron J; Ryan E; Chauhan P; DuVal J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 14584528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The competence-related abilities of women criminal defendants.
    Poythress NG; Hoge SK; Bonnie RJ; Monahan J; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 9664257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Can defendants with mental retardation successfully fake their performance on a test of competence to stand trial?
    Everington C; Notario-Smull H; Horton ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):545-60. PubMed ID: 17486631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Disagreements between court and psychiatrist on competency to stand trial.
    Reich JH; Tookey L
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1986 Jan; 47(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 3941053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Competency to stand trial evaluations in a multicultural population: Associations between psychiatric, demographic, and legal factors.
    Paradis CM; Owen E; Solomon LZ; Lane B; Gulrajani C; Fullar M; Perry A; Rai S; Lavy T; McCullough G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():79-85. PubMed ID: 27085728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.
    Soliman S; Resnick PJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):614-29. PubMed ID: 20687120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Five year research update (1991-1995): evaluations for competence to stand trial.
    Cooper DK; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 1997; 15(3):347-64. PubMed ID: 9415961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Characteristics and outcomes for defendants charged with misdemeanors referred for court-ordered competency evaluations.
    Tansey A; Brown KP; Wood ME
    Psychol Serv; 2022 May; 19(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 33749296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: a comparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants.
    Bonnie RJ; Hoge SK; Monahan J; Poythress N; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 9323652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Court-Ordered Evaluations From a Mental Health Court.
    Judd S; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 29618536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Fitness to Plead: a preliminary evaluation of a research instrument for assessing fitness to plead in England and Wales.
    Akinkunmi AA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 12539898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Commentary: Competency restoration research--complicating an already complex process.
    Rotter M; Greenspan M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 21908745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Forensic mental health clinical evaluation: an analysis of interstate and intersystemic differences.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL; Hawk G
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Aug; 21(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 9335195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Estimating Annual Numbers of Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations across the United States.
    Morris NP; McNiel DE; Binder RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):530-539. PubMed ID: 34341148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of a television crime-drama series to promote legal understanding in mentally ill, incompetent defendants: a pilot study.
    Montgomery J; Brooks MH
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 15813561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.