173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1655798)
1. Histologic evaluation of the osseous adaptation to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
Jansen JA; van de Waerden JP; Wolke JG; de Groot K
J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Aug; 25(8):973-89. PubMed ID: 1655798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic investigation of the biologic behavior of different hydroxyapatite plasma-sprayed coatings in rabbits.
Jansen JA; van der Waerden JP; Wolke JG
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 8314812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of the bone reaction to three different titanium alloy and hydroxyapatite coated implants.
Jansen JA; van der Waerden JP; Wolke JG
J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 10171978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications.
Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):225-43. PubMed ID: 2838208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gap healing enhanced by hydroxyapatite coating in dogs.
Søballe K; Hansen ES; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Hjortdal VE; Juhl GI; Pedersen CM; Hvid I; Bünger C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Nov; (272):300-7. PubMed ID: 1657476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium for use as an orthopedic biologic attachment system.
Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 May; (230):303-12. PubMed ID: 2835198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional bone response to commercially pure titanium, hydroxyapatite, and calcium-ion-mixing titanium in rabbits.
Ichikawa T; Hanawa T; Ukai H; Murakami K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 10795455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroxyapatite grafting promotes new bone formation and osseointegration of smooth titanium implants.
Allegrini S; Rumpel E; Kauschke E; Fanghänel J; König B
Ann Anat; 2006 Mar; 188(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 16551011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate coating on osseointegration of plasma-sprayed titanium alloy implants.
Stewart M; Welter JF; Goldberg VM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Apr; 69(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14999745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological and mechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated cobalt-chrome and titanium implants in the rabbit femur.
Friedman RJ; Bauer TW; Garg K; Jiang M; An YH; Draughn RA
J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 8589507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone attachment to hydroxyapatite coated polymers.
Boone PS; Zimmerman MC; Gutteling E; Lee CK; Parsons JR; Langrana N
J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Aug; 23(A2 Suppl):183-99. PubMed ID: 2674147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydroxyapatite dip coated and uncoated titanium poly-axial pedicle screws: an in vivo bovine model.
Yildirim OS; Aksakal B; Hanyaloglu SC; Erdogan F; Okur A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(8):E215-20. PubMed ID: 16622364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization and canine bone tissue reaction of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium using thermal decomposition method.
Hasegawa S
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1996 Mar; 43(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 8625434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone reaction to nano hydroxyapatite modified titanium implants placed in a gap-healing model.
Meirelles L; Albrektsson T; Kjellin P; Arvidsson A; Franke-Stenport V; Andersson M; Currie F; Wennerberg A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(3):624-31. PubMed ID: 18189300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical failure of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy implants. An animal study.
Nimb L; Gotfredsen K; Steen Jensen J
Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8116363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants.
Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 19201624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]