111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16558340)
1. Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.
Paris DL; Kokkaliaris J; Vardaxis V
J Athl Train; 1995 Sep; 30(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 16558340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.
Metcalfe RC; Schlabach GA; Looney MA; Renehan EJ
J Athl Train; 1997 Apr; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 16558443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.
Paris DL
J Athl Train; 1992; 27(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 16558170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the Sport Stirrup, Malleoloc, and Swede-O ankle orthoses for the foot-ankle kinematics of a rapid lateral movement.
Simpson KJ; Cravens S; Higbie E; Theodorou C; DelRey P
Int J Sports Med; 1999 Aug; 20(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 10496120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.
Willeford K; Stanek JM; McLoda TA
J Athl Train; 2018 Jan; 53(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 29314872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Isometric strength of rearfoot inversion and eversion in nonsupported, taped, and braced ankles assessed by a hand-held dynamometer.
Paris DL; Sullivan SJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 15(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 18796780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of an ankle brace with a subtalar locking system in inversion control in dynamic movements.
Zhang S; Wortley M; Chen Q; Freedman J
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Dec; 39(12):875-83. PubMed ID: 20026883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical stability of the subtalar joint after lateral ligament sectioning and ankle brace application: a biomechanical experimental study.
Kamiya T; Kura H; Suzuki D; Uchiyama E; Fujimiya M; Yamashita T
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Dec; 37(12):2451-8. PubMed ID: 19654428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leuko and Nessa Ankle braces: effectiveness before and after exercise.
Tweedy R; Carson T; Vicenzino B
Aust J Sci Med Sport; 1994; 26(3-4):62-6. PubMed ID: 8665279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the inverted surface landing more suitable in evaluating ankle braces and ankle inversion perturbation?
Chen Q; Wortley M; Bhaskaran D; Milner CE; Zhang S
Clin J Sport Med; 2012 May; 22(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 22382431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Static and dynamic roentgenographic analysis of ankle stability in braced and nonbraced stable and functionally unstable ankles.
Vaes PH; Duquet W; Casteleyn PP; Handelberg F; Opdecam P
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 9784818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Mechanical Functionality of the EXO-L Ankle Brace: Assessment With a 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Stress Test.
Kleipool RP; Natenstedt JJ; Streekstra GJ; Dobbe JG; Gerards RM; Blankevoort L; Tuijthof GJ
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 44(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 26589838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gait comparison of subjects with hemiplegia walking unbraced, with ankle-foot orthosis, and with Air-Stirrup brace.
Burdett RG; Borello-France D; Blatchly C; Potter C
Phys Ther; 1988 Aug; 68(8):1197-203. PubMed ID: 3399515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Sex and Ankle Brace Design on Knee Biomechanics During a Single-Leg Cut.
Ihmels WD; Seymore KD; Brown TN
Am J Sports Med; 2020 May; 48(6):1496-1504. PubMed ID: 32223652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Passive stability characteristics of ankle braces and tape in simulated barefoot and shoe conditions.
Eils E; Imberge S; Völker K; Rosenbaum D
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 17092922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the passive support provided by various ankle braces.
Alves JW; Alday RV; Ketcham DL; Lentell G
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 15(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 18796797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of Novel Ankle Prophylactic Compared With Lace-Up Brace or Tape.
Ihmels WD; Seymore KD; Brown TN
J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Jul; 29(5):693-696. PubMed ID: 31899891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of prophylactic ankle support during simulated soccer activity.
Forbes H; Thrussell S; Haycock N; Lohkamp M; White M
J Sport Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 22(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 23348102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in ankle range of motion before and after exercise in 2 tape conditions.
Purcell SB; Schuckman BE; Docherty CL; Schrader J; Poppy W
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):383-9. PubMed ID: 19088055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Influence of Ankle Braces on Functional Performance Tests and Ankle Joint Range of Motion.
Mann B; Gruber AH; Murphy SP; Docherty CL
J Sport Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 28(8):817-823. PubMed ID: 30300098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
