111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16558340)
21. The three-dimensional passive support characteristics of ankle braces.
Siegler S; Liu W; Sennett B; Nobilini RJ; Dunbar D
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1997 Dec; 26(6):299-309. PubMed ID: 9402566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of the ankle stabilizing orthosis on foot and ankle kinematics during cutting maneuvers.
Gudibanda A; Wang Y
Res Sports Med; 2005; 13(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 16392443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.
Burks RT; Bean BG; Marcus R; Barker HB
Am J Sports Med; 1991; 19(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 2039059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prophylactic ankle bracing reduces rearfoot motion during sudden inversion.
Cordova ML; Dorrough JL; Kious K; Ingersoll CD; Merrick MA
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Jun; 17(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 16800843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of inversion and ankle bracing on peroneus longus Hoffmann reflex.
Sefton JM; Hicks-Little CA; Koceja DM; Cordova ML
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2007 Oct; 17(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17076833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ankle bracing in running: the effect of a Push type medium ankle brace upon movements of the foot and ankle during the stance phase.
De Clercq DL
Int J Sports Med; 1997 Apr; 18(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 9187979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.
Martin N; Harter RA
J Athl Train; 1993; 28(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 16558248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.
Beriau MR; Cox WB; Manning J
J Athl Train; 1994 Sep; 29(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 16558284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of ankle taping on detection of inversion-eversion movements in participants with recurrent ankle sprain.
Refshauge KM; Raymond J; Kilbreath SL; Pengel L; Heijnen I
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):371-5. PubMed ID: 18927252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of an ankle brace on the in vivo kinematics of patients with chronic ankle instability during walking on an inversion platform.
Cao S; Wang C; Zhang G; Ma X; Wang X; Huang J; Zhang C; Wang K
Gait Posture; 2019 Jul; 72():228-233. PubMed ID: 31271970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bracing and rehabilitation--what's new.
Arnold BL; Docherty CL
Clin Sports Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 15062585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of different skin-ankle brace application pressures with and without shoes on single-limb balance, electromyographic activation onset and peroneal reaction time of lower limb muscles.
Papadopoulos ES; Nikolopoulos CS; Athanasopoulos S
Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):228-36. PubMed ID: 20307442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ankle braces effectively reduce recurrence of ankle sprains in female soccer players.
Sharpe SR; Knapik J; Jones B
J Athl Train; 1997 Jan; 32(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 16558427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ankle sprains. Comparison of long-term results of functional treatment methods with adhesive tape and bandage ("brace") and stability measurement].
Twellaar M; Veldhuizen JW; Verstappen FT
Unfallchirurg; 1993 Sep; 96(9):477-82. PubMed ID: 8235685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Duration of strength retention of ankle taping during activities of daily living.
Fleet K; Galen S; Moore C
Injury; 2009 Mar; 40(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 19171339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of ankle taping and bracing on vertical ground reaction forces during drop landings before and after treadmill jogging.
Riemann BL; Schmitz RJ; Gale M; McCaw ST
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 32(12):628-35. PubMed ID: 12492272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.
Fumich RM; Ellison AE; Guerin GJ; Grace PD
Am J Sports Med; 1981; 9(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 7235113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability and validity of active, passive and dynamic range of motion tests.
Nigg BM; Nigg CR; Reinschmidt C
Sportverletz Sportschaden; 1995 Jun; 9(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 7667765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
de Asla RJ; Wan L; Rubash HE; Li G
J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 16609963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prophylactic bracing versus taping for the prevention of ankle sprains in high school athletes: a prospective, randomized trial.
Mickel TJ; Bottoni CR; Tsuji G; Chang K; Baum L; Tokushige KA
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2006; 45(6):360-5. PubMed ID: 17145460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
