BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16562414)

  • 1. Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students.
    White HR; Morgan TJ; Pugh LA; Celinska K; Labouvie EW; Pandina RJ
    J Stud Alcohol; 2006 Mar; 67(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 16562414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention.
    White HR; Mun EY; Pugh L; Morgan TJ
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2007 Aug; 31(8):1380-91. PubMed ID: 17550361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do brief personalized feedback interventions work for mandated students or is it just getting caught that works?
    White HR; Mun EY; Morgan TJ
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2008 Mar; 22(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 18298236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions.
    Carey KB; Carey MP; Henson JM; Maisto SA; DeMartini KS
    Addiction; 2011 Mar; 106(3):528-37. PubMed ID: 21059184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated college students: a pilot study.
    Terlecki MA; Larimer ME; Copeland AL
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2010 Jan; 71(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 20105414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incident-specific and individual-level moderators of brief intervention effects with mandated college students.
    Mastroleo NR; Murphy JG; Colby SM; Monti PM; Barnett NP
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2011 Dec; 25(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 21766975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
    Borsari B; Carey KB
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 16187809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual and situational factors that influence the efficacy of personalized feedback substance use interventions for mandated college students.
    Mun EY; White HR; Morgan TJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2009 Feb; 77(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 19170456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Novel Approach for Streamlining Delivery of Brief Motivational Interventions to Mandated College Students: Using Group and Individual Sessions Matched to Level of Risk.
    Bernstein MH; Baird GL; Yusufov M; Mastroleo NR; Carey KB; Graney DD; Wood MD
    Subst Use Misuse; 2017 Dec; 52(14):1883-1891. PubMed ID: 28812420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.
    Barnett NP; Murphy JG; Colby SM; Monti PM
    Addict Behav; 2007 Nov; 32(11):2529-48. PubMed ID: 17707594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of short-term change after a brief alcohol intervention for mandated college drinkers.
    Carey KB; Merrill JE; Walsh JL; Lust SA; Kalichman SC; Carey MP
    Addict Behav; 2018 Feb; 77():152-159. PubMed ID: 29032317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.
    Butler LH; Correia CJ
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2009 Mar; 23(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 19290702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two Web-based alcohol interventions for mandated college students.
    Doumas DM; McKinley LL; Book P
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18657941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated college students.
    Tevyaw TO; Borsari B; Colby SM; Monti PM
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2007 Mar; 21(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 17385961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated and voluntary freshmen: A 1-year follow-up assessment.
    Kazemi DM; Levine MJ; Qi L; Dmochowski J
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 25982774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in drinking before a mandated brief intervention with college students.
    Morgan TJ; White HR; Mun EY
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2008 Mar; 69(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 18299770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When wanting to change is not enough: automatic appetitive processes moderate the effects of a brief alcohol intervention in hazardous-drinking college students.
    Ostafin BD; Palfai TP
    Addict Sci Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 7(1):25. PubMed ID: 23217219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.
    Borsari B; Carey KB
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2000 Aug; 68(4):728-33. PubMed ID: 10965648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are there secondary effects on marijuana use from brief alcohol interventions for college students?
    White HR; Jiao Y; Ray AE; Huh D; Atkins DC; Larimer ME; Fromme K; Corbin WR; Baer JS; LaBrie JW; Mun EY
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2015 May; 76(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 25978822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Descriptive norms and expectancies as mediators of a brief motivational intervention for mandated college students receiving stepped care for alcohol use.
    Yurasek AM; Borsari B; Magill M; Mastroleo NR; Hustad JT; Tevyaw TO; Barnett NP; Kahler CW; Monti PM
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2015 Dec; 29(4):1003-11. PubMed ID: 26098125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.