These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set. Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In silico prediction of mitochondrial toxicity by using GA-CG-SVM approach. Zhang H; Chen QY; Xiang ML; Ma CY; Huang Q; Yang SY Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Feb; 23(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 18940245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of the MAD algorithm for virtual screening. Eckert H; Bajorath J Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():349-62. PubMed ID: 18712313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QSAR modeling of anti-invasive activity of organic compounds using structural descriptors. Katritzky AR; Kuanar M; Dobchev DA; Vanhoecke BW; Karelson M; Parmar VS; Stevens CV; Bracke ME Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 14(20):6933-9. PubMed ID: 16908166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set. Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of biological activity for high-throughput screening using binary kernel discrimination. Harper G; Bradshaw J; Gittins JC; Green DV; Leach AR J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 11604029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HMM-ModE--improved classification using profile hidden Markov models by optimising the discrimination threshold and modifying emission probabilities with negative training sequences. Srivastava PK; Desai DK; Nandi S; Lynn AM BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():104. PubMed ID: 17389042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. 4. Multi-target QSAR modeling and comparative multi-distance study of the giant components of antiviral drug-drug complex networks. Prado-Prado FJ; Martinez de la Vega O; Uriarte E; Ubeira FM; Chou KC; González-Díaz H Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jan; 17(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 19112024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and evaluation of a molecular fingerprint involving the transformation of property descriptor values into a binary classification scheme. Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1151-7. PubMed ID: 12870906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel search engine for virtual screening of very large databases. Vidal D; Thormann M; Pons M J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):836-43. PubMed ID: 16563015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On-the-fly selection of a training set for aqueous solubility prediction. Zhang H; Ando HY; Chen L; Lee PH Mol Pharm; 2007; 4(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 17628076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SVM model for virtual screening of Lck inhibitors. Liew CY; Ma XH; Liu X; Yap CW J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):877-85. PubMed ID: 19267483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]