These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16564045)

  • 1. Predictability and limitations of non-invasive murine tonometry: comparison of two devices.
    Filippopoulos T; Matsubara A; Danias J; Huang W; Dobberfuhl A; Ren L; Mittag T; Miller JW; Grosskreutz CL
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jul; 83(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 16564045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
    Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manometric calibration and comparison of TonoLab and TonoPen tonometers in rats with experimental glaucoma and in normal mice.
    Pease ME; Hammond JC; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Dec; 15(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 17106364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat.
    Kontiola AI; Goldblum D; Mittag T; Danias J
    Exp Eye Res; 2001 Dec; 73(6):781-5. PubMed ID: 11846509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry.
    Kim CY; Kuehn MH; Anderson MG; Kwon YH
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Sep; 21(9):1202-9. PubMed ID: 16946746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
    Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
    Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
    Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer.
    Wang WH; Millar JC; Pang IH; Wax MB; Clark AF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4617-21. PubMed ID: 16303957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in rabbits.
    Abrams LS; Vitale S; Jampel HD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 8603880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of TonoLab in detecting physiological and pharmacological changes of mouse intraocular pressure--comparison with TonoPen and microneedle manometery.
    Saeki T; Aihara M; Ohashi M; Araie M
    Curr Eye Res; 2008 Mar; 33(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 18350435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
    Davies LN; Bartlett H; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wireless contact lens sensor for intraocular pressure monitoring: assessment on enucleated pig eyes.
    Leonardi M; Pitchon EM; Bertsch A; Renaud P; Mermoud A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 87(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 19016660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
    Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error.
    Choudhari NS; George R; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Dudeja N
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18708256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses.
    Ahn JT; Jeong MB; Park YW; Kim SE; Ahn JS; Lee YR; Lee ER; Seo K
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive measurement of rat intraocular pressure with the Tono-Pen.
    Moore CG; Milne ST; Morrison JC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Feb; 34(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 8440590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.