BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16564081)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
    Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.
    Al-Omari WM; Shadid R; Abu-Naba'a L; El Masoud B
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):263-73. PubMed ID: 20136704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
    Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
    Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
    Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of framework design on fracture resistance of metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
    de Oliveira JL; Martins LM; Sanada J; de Oliveira PC; do Valle AL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 20617225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of load cycling on metal ceramic screw-retained implant restorations with unrestored and restored screw access holes.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18182181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
    Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
    Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 May; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 16629897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.