518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16564264)
1. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement.
Chang BC; Lim SH; Yi G; Hong YS; Lee S; Yoo KJ; Kang MS; Cho BK
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 81(4):1317-23, discussion 1323-4. PubMed ID: 16564264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era.
Filsoufi F; Anyanwu AC; Salzberg SP; Frankel T; Cohn LH; Adams DH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 16122441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is not superior in patients younger than 65 years who need long-term anticoagulation.
Hwang HY; Kim KH; Kim KB; Ahn H
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1154-60. PubMed ID: 22365259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic follow up of patients with CarboMedics valves in the tricuspid position.
Shapira Y; Nili M; Hirsch R; Vaturi M; Vidne B; Sagie A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 10888097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S
N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical valve replacement in congenital heart disease in children.
Lubiszewska B; Rozanski J; Szufladowicz M; Szaroszyk W; Hoffman P; Ksiezycka E; Rydlewska-Sadowska W; Ruzyllo W
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10096487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical valve replacement versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in the tricuspid valve position.
Cho WC; Park CB; Kim JB; Jung SH; Chung CH; Choo SJ; Lee JW
J Card Surg; 2013 May; 28(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 23488674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prosthetic valve replacement in children].
Sasahashi N; Ando F; Okamoto F; Hanada M; Yamanaka K; Kameyama T; Nishigaki Y; Hirose K; Kambara A; Sakazaki H; Suzuki T; Makino S
Kyobu Geka; 1999 Apr; 52(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 10226417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tricuspid valve replacement: clinical long-term results for acquired isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation.
Maleszka A; Kleikamp G; Koerfer R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):957-61. PubMed ID: 15597590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary triple valve surgery for advanced rheumatic heart disease in Mainland China: a single-center experience with 871 clinical cases.
Han QQ; Xu ZY; Zhang BR; Zou LJ; Hao JH; Huang SD
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17336080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement.
Lund O; Bland M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jul; 132(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16798297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is a bioprosthesis preferable in tricuspid valve replacement?
Hayashi J; Saito A; Yamamoto K; Watanabe H; Ohzeki H; Eguchi S
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Oct; 44(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 8948549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcome after isolated tricuspid valve replacement: 20-year experience.
Do QB; Pellerin M; Carrier M; Cartier R; Hébert Y; Pagé P; Perrault LP; Pelletier LC
Can J Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 16(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 10787464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Tricuspid valve replacement and anticoagulation therapy: a report of 70 cases].
Dong L; Xiao XJ; Zhang EY; Hu J; Yuan HS; Shi YK; Ren L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 46(24):1910-2. PubMed ID: 19134385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses.
Silberman S; Oren A; Dotan M; Merin O; Fink D; Deeb M; Bitran D
J Card Surg; 2008; 23(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 18462345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
