These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16564609)

  • 1. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Paek D; Park DY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 16564609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.
    Jeong JY; Choi S; Kho YL; Kim PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 20709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Taiwan.
    Shih TS; Wu KY; Chen HI; Chang CP; Chang HY; Huang YS; Liou SH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 16701932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Japan.
    Takahashi K; Higashi T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16510222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China.
    Liang Y; Wong O; Yang L; Li T; Su Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16624464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing regulations for occupational exposures to health hazards in Malaysia.
    Rampal KG; Mohd Nizam J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 16899331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development and implementation of occupational exposure limits in Hong Kong.
    Tsin TW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16530314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Singapore.
    Tang TK; Siang LH; Koh D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 16624463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
    Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.
    Stouten H; Ott H; Bouwman C; Wardenbach P
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Jun; 51(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 18409185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.
    Schenk L; Hansson SO; Rudén C; Gilek M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Mar; 50(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 18226844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Problems concerning the integration of "derived-no-effect-levels" (DNELS) into occupational safety and health regulations].
    Gromiec J
    Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18663897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approaches for the development of occupational exposure limits for man-made mineral fibres (MMMFs).
    Ziegler-Skylakakis K
    Mutat Res; 2004 Sep; 553(1-2):37-41. PubMed ID: 15288531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [ASLE for chemicals in the air of workplace. History, contemporary state, prospects].
    Sidorov KK
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2011; (7):33-7. PubMed ID: 22043522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lead exposure, lead poisoning, and lead regulatory standards in China, 1990-2005.
    Ye X; Wong O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 16782249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The significance of neurobehavioral tests for occupational exposure limits: an example from Sweden.
    Edling C; Lundberg P
    Neurotoxicology; 2000 Oct; 21(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 11130268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.
    Deveau M; Chen CP; Johanson G; Krewski D; Maier A; Niven KJ; Ripple S; Schulte PA; Silk J; Urbanus JH; Zalk DM; Niemeier RW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. PubMed ID: 26099071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The right to know about chemical hazards in Canada, 1982-2006.
    Bennett D
    New Solut; 2008; 18(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 18511399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.