379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16564614)
1. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database.
Grossfeld GD; Chang JJ; Broering JM; Miller DP; Yu J; Flanders SC; Henning JM; Stier DM; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1171-7; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Schaeffer AJ; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 17320668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Impact of the learning curve on positive surgical margins.
Erdogru T; Celik O; Akand M; Akin Y; Sahin AF; Ciftcioglu MA
Arch Esp Urol; 2013 May; 66(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 23676539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].
Pereira Arias JG; Gamarra Quintanilla M; Leibar Tamayo A; Astobieta Odriozola A; Ibarluzea González G
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 May; 34(5):428-39. PubMed ID: 20470715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
Doumerc N; Yuen C; Savdie R; Rahman MB; Rasiah KK; Pe Benito R; Delprado W; Matthews J; Haynes AM; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20067454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes?
Weizer AZ; Strope S; Wood DP
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 20219561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: learning curve of first 100 cases.
Ou YC; Yang CR; Wang J; Cheng CL; Patel VR
Int J Urol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):635-40. PubMed ID: 20438586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
