406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16564863)
1. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation.
Eloubeidi MA; Tamhane A; Varadarajulu S; Wilcox CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Apr; 63(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 16564863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years' experience at a referral center.
Bournet B; Migueres I; Delacroix M; Vigouroux D; Bornet JL; Escourrou J; Buscail L
Endoscopy; 2006 Apr; 38(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16680633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States.
Eloubeidi MA; Gress FG; Savides TJ; Wiersema MJ; Kochman ML; Ahmad NA; Ginsberg GG; Erickson RA; Dewitt J; Van Dam J; Nickl NJ; Levy MJ; Clain JE; Chak A; Sivak MV; Wong R; Isenberg G; Scheiman JM; Bounds B; Kimmey MB; Saunders MD; Chang KJ; Sharma A; Nguyen P; Lee JG; Edmundowicz SA; Early D; Azar R; Etemad B; Chen YK; Waxman I; Shami V; Catalano MF; Wilcox CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Sep; 60(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 15332028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.
Yusuf TE; Ho S; Pavey DA; Michael H; Gress FG
Endoscopy; 2009 May; 41(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 19418399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses.
Nguyen YP; Maple JT; Zhang Q; Ylagan LR; Zhai J; Kohlmeier C; Jonnalagadda S; Early DS; Edmundowicz SA; Azar RR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 19243768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis.
Varadarajulu S; Tamhane A; Eloubeidi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Nov; 62(5):728-36; quiz 751, 753. PubMed ID: 16246688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications.
Eloubeidi MA; Chen VK; Eltoum IA; Jhala D; Chhieng DC; Jhala N; Vickers SM; Wilcox CM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Dec; 98(12):2663-8. PubMed ID: 14687813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and clinical significance of hyperamylasemia after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions: a prospective and controlled study.
Fernández-Esparrach G; Ginès A; García P; Pellisé M; Solé M; Cortés P; Gimeno-García AZ; Sendino O; Navarro S; Llach J; Bordas JM; Castells A
Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):720-4. PubMed ID: 17661248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: the utility and impact on management of patients.
Kliment M; Urban O; Cegan M; Fojtik P; Falt P; Dvorackova J; Lovecek M; Straka M; Jaluvka F
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2010 Nov; 45(11):1372-9. PubMed ID: 20626304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EUS-FNA with rescue fluorescence in situ hybridization for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in patients with inconclusive on-site cytopathology results.
Kubiliun N; Ribeiro A; Fan YS; Rocha-Lima CM; Sleeman D; Merchan J; Barkin J; Levi J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21752364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement.
Savides TJ; Donohue M; Hunt G; Al-Haddad M; Aslanian H; Ben-Menachem T; Chen VK; Coyle W; Deutsch J; DeWitt J; Dhawan M; Eckardt A; Eloubeidi M; Esker A; Gordon SR; Gress F; Ikenberry S; Joyce AM; Klapman J; Lo S; Maluf-Filho F; Nickl N; Singh V; Wills J; Behling C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Aug; 66(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17643700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.
Horwhat JD; Paulson EK; McGrath K; Branch MS; Baillie J; Tyler D; Pappas T; Enns R; Robuck G; Stiffler H; Jowell P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jun; 63(7):966-75. PubMed ID: 16733111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective assessment of diagnostic utility and complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Results from a newly developed academic endoscopic ultrasound program.
Eloubeidi MA; Tamhane A
Dig Dis; 2008; 26(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 19188728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical impact of K-ras mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA specimens from pancreatic masses.
Ogura T; Yamao K; Sawaki A; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Shimizu Y; Bhatia V; Higuchi K; Hosoda W; Yatabe Y
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 22284089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard FNA in evaluating cystic lesions of the pancreas: a pilot study.
Al-Haddad M; Raimondo M; Woodward T; Krishna M; Pungpapong S; Noh K; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 May; 65(6):894-8. PubMed ID: 17210151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adverse events of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cystic and solid lesions by using the lexicon proposed in an ASGE workshop: a prospective and comparative study.
Rodríguez-D'Jesús A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Marra-Lopez C; Orive-Calzada A; Sendino O; Araujo IK; Rodríguez de Miguel C; Vázquez-Sequeiros E; Córdova H; Sánchez-Montes C; González-Suárez B; Ginès A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Apr; 83(4):780-4. PubMed ID: 26301408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles.
Siddiqui UD; Rossi F; Rosenthal LS; Padda MS; Murali-Dharan V; Aslanian HR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Dec; 70(6):1093-7. PubMed ID: 19640524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False-positive EUS-guided FNA cytology for solid pancreatic lesions.
Siddiqui AA; Kowalski TE; Shahid H; O'Donnell S; Tolin J; Loren DE; Infantolino A; Hong SK; Eloubeidi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 21737075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
