These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16565656)
1. Quality and completeness of histopathology reports of rectal cancer resections. Results of an audit in Brittany. Eon Y; Le Douy JY; Lamer B; Battini J; Bretagne JF Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 16565656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit. Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting. Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathology data in the central databases of multicenter randomized trials need to be based on pathology reports and controlled by trained quality managers. Nagtegaal ID; Kranenbarg EK; Hermans J; van de Velde CJ; van Krieken JH J Clin Oncol; 2000 Apr; 18(8):1771-9. PubMed ID: 10764439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of pathological reports of postoperative specimens in rectal cancer: an audit from the Mazovia region. Olszyna-Serementa M; Kołodziejczyk M; Sprawka A; Nasierowska-Guttmejer A; Bujko K Pol J Pathol; 2009; 60(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 20069506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can pathological reports of rectal cancer provide national quality indicators? Keane C; Lin AY; Kramer N; Bissett I ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):E639-E643. PubMed ID: 29569820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oesophageal and gastric cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit. Burroughs SH; Biffin AH; Pye JK; Williams GT J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jun; 52(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 10562811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National multicentric evaluation of quality of pathology reports for rectal cancer in France in 2016. Boutanos C; Capdepont M; Svrcek M; Thélu F; Guedj N; Poizat F; Bibeau F; Turlin B; Rousseau A; Bardier A; Selves J; Desrousseaux M; Le Pessot F; Bonhomme B; Laverrière MH; Julié C; Eyremandi RP; Stanislas S; Bazille C; Daubech A; Lazure T; Bordier MS; Demoures A; Rullier A Virchows Arch; 2019 May; 474(5):561-568. PubMed ID: 30729335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An audit comparing the reporting of staging MRI scans for rectal cancer with the London Cancer Alliance (LCA) guidelines. Siddiqui MRS; Shanmuganandan AP; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Brown G; Abulafi AM Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2093-2104. PubMed ID: 28947340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision]. Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial. Verleye L; Ottevanger PB; Kristensen GB; Ehlen T; Johnson N; van der Burg ME; Reed NS; Verheijen RH; Gaarenstroom KN; Mosgaard B; Seoane JM; van der Velden J; Lotocki R; van der Graaf W; Penninckx B; Coens C; Stuart G; Vergote I Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 20850296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation. Chiesura-Corona M; Muzzio PC; Giust G; Zuliani M; Pucciarelli S; Toppan P Abdom Imaging; 2001; 26(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 11178688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do MRI reports contain adequate preoperative staging information for end users to make appropriate treatment decisions for rectal cancer? Al-Sukhni E; Messenger DE; Charles Victor J; McLeod RS; Kennedy ED Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):1148-55. PubMed ID: 23143592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting. Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the Quality of MRI Reports of Preoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: Effect of National Guidelines and Structured Reporting. Tersteeg JJC; Gobardhan PD; Crolla RMPH; Kint PAM; Niers-Stobbe I; Boonman-de Winter LJM; Schreinemakers JMJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1240-1244. PubMed ID: 29570375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer-an overview. Nagtegaal ID; van Krieken JH Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(7):964-72. PubMed ID: 11978521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ; van der Worp E; Kapiteijn E; Quirke P; van Krieken JH; J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(7):1729-34. PubMed ID: 11919228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Nikberg M; Kindler C; Chabok A; Letocha H; Shetye J; Smedh K Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Mar; 58(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 25664704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports. Campbell F; Griffiths DF J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 47(4):360-1. PubMed ID: 8027377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]