124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16565656)
1. Quality and completeness of histopathology reports of rectal cancer resections. Results of an audit in Brittany.
Eon Y; Le Douy JY; Lamer B; Battini J; Bretagne JF
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 16565656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathology data in the central databases of multicenter randomized trials need to be based on pathology reports and controlled by trained quality managers.
Nagtegaal ID; Kranenbarg EK; Hermans J; van de Velde CJ; van Krieken JH
J Clin Oncol; 2000 Apr; 18(8):1771-9. PubMed ID: 10764439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of pathological reports of postoperative specimens in rectal cancer: an audit from the Mazovia region.
Olszyna-Serementa M; Kołodziejczyk M; Sprawka A; Nasierowska-Guttmejer A; Bujko K
Pol J Pathol; 2009; 60(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 20069506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can pathological reports of rectal cancer provide national quality indicators?
Keane C; Lin AY; Kramer N; Bissett I
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):E639-E643. PubMed ID: 29569820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oesophageal and gastric cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
Burroughs SH; Biffin AH; Pye JK; Williams GT
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jun; 52(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 10562811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National multicentric evaluation of quality of pathology reports for rectal cancer in France in 2016.
Boutanos C; Capdepont M; Svrcek M; Thélu F; Guedj N; Poizat F; Bibeau F; Turlin B; Rousseau A; Bardier A; Selves J; Desrousseaux M; Le Pessot F; Bonhomme B; Laverrière MH; Julié C; Eyremandi RP; Stanislas S; Bazille C; Daubech A; Lazure T; Bordier MS; Demoures A; Rullier A
Virchows Arch; 2019 May; 474(5):561-568. PubMed ID: 30729335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An audit comparing the reporting of staging MRI scans for rectal cancer with the London Cancer Alliance (LCA) guidelines.
Siddiqui MRS; Shanmuganandan AP; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Brown G; Abulafi AM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2093-2104. PubMed ID: 28947340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial.
Verleye L; Ottevanger PB; Kristensen GB; Ehlen T; Johnson N; van der Burg ME; Reed NS; Verheijen RH; Gaarenstroom KN; Mosgaard B; Seoane JM; van der Velden J; Lotocki R; van der Graaf W; Penninckx B; Coens C; Stuart G; Vergote I
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 20850296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation.
Chiesura-Corona M; Muzzio PC; Giust G; Zuliani M; Pucciarelli S; Toppan P
Abdom Imaging; 2001; 26(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 11178688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do MRI reports contain adequate preoperative staging information for end users to make appropriate treatment decisions for rectal cancer?
Al-Sukhni E; Messenger DE; Charles Victor J; McLeod RS; Kennedy ED
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):1148-55. PubMed ID: 23143592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the Quality of MRI Reports of Preoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: Effect of National Guidelines and Structured Reporting.
Tersteeg JJC; Gobardhan PD; Crolla RMPH; Kint PAM; Niers-Stobbe I; Boonman-de Winter LJM; Schreinemakers JMJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1240-1244. PubMed ID: 29570375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer-an overview.
Nagtegaal ID; van Krieken JH
Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(7):964-72. PubMed ID: 11978521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control.
Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ; van der Worp E; Kapiteijn E; Quirke P; van Krieken JH;
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(7):1729-34. PubMed ID: 11919228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer.
Nikberg M; Kindler C; Chabok A; Letocha H; Shetye J; Smedh K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Mar; 58(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 25664704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports.
Campbell F; Griffiths DF
J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 47(4):360-1. PubMed ID: 8027377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
