200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16565756)
1. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
Sim SM; Rasiah RI
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Kheyami D; Jaradat A; Al-Shibani T; Ali FA
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 29666684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
Nnodim JO
Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.
Vuma S; Sa B
J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 31435208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology.
Tan LT; McAleer JJ;
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Oct; 20(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 18585017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions.
Douthit NT; Norcini J; Mazuz K; Alkan M; Feuerstein MT; Clarfield AM; Dwolatzky T; Solomonov E; Waksman I; Biswas S
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():640204. PubMed ID: 34368038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Item analysis of examinations in the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.
Hermi A; Achour W
Tunis Med; 2016 Apr; 94(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 27704506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do item-writing flaws reduce examinations psychometric quality?
Pais J; Silva A; Guimarães B; Povo A; Coelho E; Silva-Pereira F; Lourinho I; Ferreira MA; Severo M
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Aug; 9(1):399. PubMed ID: 27516160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
