These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16565756)

  • 21. Difficulty and discrimination indices of multiple-choice examination items in a college of pharmacy therapeutics and pathophysiology course sequence.
    Caballero J; Wolowich WR; Benavides S; Marino J
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2014 Feb; 22(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 23419201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
    Al Ameer AY
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Student perception and post-exam analysis of one best MCQs and one correct MCQs: A comparative study.
    Adhi MI; Aly SM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Apr; 68(4):570-575. PubMed ID: 29808047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A reappraisal of the use of the phi-coefficient in multiple choice examinations.
    Koeslag JH; Schach SR; Melzer CW
    Med Educ; 1987 Jan; 21(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 3821601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.
    Premadasa IG
    Med Teach; 1993; 15(2-3):237-42. PubMed ID: 8246720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
    Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics.
    Madhav VN
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1314-9. PubMed ID: 26522636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of multiple-choice items.
    Moussa MA; Ouda BA; Nemeth A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1991 Apr; 34(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1873997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
    Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Counting apples with oranges: a limitation of the discrimination index.
    Hobsley M
    Med Educ; 1999 Mar; 33(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10211239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determinants of Difficulty and Discriminating Power of Image-based Test Items in Postgraduate Radiological Examinations.
    Rutgers DR; van Raamt F; van der Gijp A; Mol C; Ten Cate O
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):665-672. PubMed ID: 29198947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.
    Kaur M; Singla S; Mahajan R
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2016; 6(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 27563581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sound Practices: An Exploratory Study of Building and Monitoring Multiple-Choice Exams at Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Programs.
    St-Onge C; Young M; Renaud JS; Cummings BA; Drescher O; Varpio L
    Acad Med; 2021 Feb; 96(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 32769474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
    Pamphlett R
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.