123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16566247)
21. Age and the human cochlear traveling wave delay.
Ramotowski D; Kimberley B
Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 9562533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
Vinay ; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 17496673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cochlear Dead Regions in Sporadic Unilateral Vestibular Schwannomas Using the Threshold-Equalizing Noise Test.
Byun H; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):271-278. PubMed ID: 31665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Threshold Equalizing Noise Test Reveals Suprathreshold Loss of Hearing Function, Even in the "Normal" Audiogram Range.
Stone MA; Perugia E; Bakay W; Lough M; Whiston H; Plack CJ
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1208-1221. PubMed ID: 35276701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. No cochlear dead regions detected in non-pulsatile tinnitus patients: an assessment with the threshold equalizing noise (sound pressure level) test.
Gilles A; De Ridder D; Van de Heyning P
Noise Health; 2013; 15(63):129-33. PubMed ID: 23571303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Are There Cochlear Dead Regions Involved in Hearing Loss after Cisplatin Ototoxicity?
Schultz C; Pecora Liberman PH; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(5):253-257. PubMed ID: 31661686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.
Cox RM; Alexander GC; Johnson J; Rivera I
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 21522068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of an aided TEN test for diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
Marriage J; Moore BC; Ogg V; Stone MA
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 18344872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
Kluk K; Moore BC
Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):115-31. PubMed ID: 15668043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency-specific aspects of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by 1000-Hz filtered clicks in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
Audiology; 1993; 32(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8447757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions.
Cairns S; Frith R; Munro KJ; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):575-84. PubMed ID: 17922347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Hauser R; Probst R; Löhle E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1991; 248(6):345-52. PubMed ID: 1930984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
Moore BC; Vinay SN
Brain; 2009 Feb; 132(Pt 2):524-36. PubMed ID: 19036764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dead regions and noisiness of pure tones.
Huss M; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2005 Oct; 44(10):599-611. PubMed ID: 16315451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
