163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16566743)
1. Scientific basis for the selection of absorbent underpads that remain securely attached to underlying bed or chair.
Edlich RF; Winters KL; Long WB; Gubler KD
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 16566743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Innovations in the design and performance of underpads for patients with burns.
Biesecker JE; Thomas HL; Thacker JG; Blackwood HS; Edlich RF
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(1):66-73; discussion 65-6. PubMed ID: 7721913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Compare a Disposable, High-fluid Capacity Underpad to Nonpermeable, Disposable, Reusable Containment Products on Incontinence-associated Dermatitis Rates Among Skilled Nursing Facility Residents.
Motta G; Milne CT
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Dec; 63(12):22-28. PubMed ID: 29324430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disposable Versus Reusable Absorbent Underpads for Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis and Pressure Injuries.
Francis K; Pang SM; Cohen B; Salter H; Homel P
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(4):374-379. PubMed ID: 28549048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diapers and underpads, Part 2: Cost outcomes.
Brown DS
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994; 40(9):34-6, 38, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 7546107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical study: assessing the performance and skin environments of two reusable underpads.
Leiby DM; Shanahan N
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Oct; 40(8):30-2, 34-7. PubMed ID: 7546098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbent products for urinary/faecal incontinence: a comparative evaluation of key product designs.
Fader M; Cottenden A; Getliffe K; Gage H; Clarke-O'Neill S; Jamieson K; Green N; Williams P; Brooks R; Malone-Lee J
Health Technol Assess; 2008 Jul; 12(29):iii-iv, ix-185. PubMed ID: 18547500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure ulcer prevention.
Edlich RF; Winters KL; Woodard CR; Buschbacher RM; Long WB; Gebhart JH; Ma EK
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(4):285-304. PubMed ID: 15447627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of multiple layers of linens on surface interface pressure: results of a laboratory study.
Williamson R; Lachenbruch C; Vangilder C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Jun; 59(6):38-48. PubMed ID: 23749661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Prospective, Descriptive, Quality Improvement Study to Investigate the Impact of a Turn-and-Position Device on the Incidence of Hospital-acquired Sacral Pressure Ulcers and Nursing Staff Time Needed for Repositioning Patients.
Hall KD; Clark RC
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Nov; 62(11):40-44. PubMed ID: 27861136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent advances in absorbent products for the incontinent patient with burns.
Biesecker JE; Edlich RF; Thomas HL; Steers WD
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(2 Pt 1):146-53; discussion 145. PubMed ID: 7775510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Dumville JC; Legood R; Cullum NA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD001735. PubMed ID: 18843621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin disorders and moisture in incontinent nursing home residents: intervention implications.
Schnelle JF; Adamson GM; Cruise PA; al-Samarrai N; Sarbaugh FC; Uman G; Ouslander JG
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Oct; 45(10):1182-8. PubMed ID: 9329478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.
Black J; Berke C; Urzendowski G
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 22552108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time of Onset to Changes in Skin Condition During Exposure to Synthetic Urine: A Prospective Study.
Phipps L; Gray M; Call E
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2019; 46(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 31274862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A laboratory study examining the impact of linen use on low-air-loss support surface heat and water vapor transmission rates.
Williamson R; Lachenbruch C; VanGilder C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Aug; 59(8):32-41. PubMed ID: 23934376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low airloss hydrotherapy versus standard care for incontinent hospitalized patients.
Bennett RG; Baran PJ; DeVone LV; Bacetti H; Kristo B; Tayback M; Greenough WB
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 May; 46(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 9588369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
Cullum N; McInnes E; Bell-Syer SE; Legood R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001735. PubMed ID: 15266452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of total body tissue interface pressure of specialized pressure-relieving mattresses.
Hickerson WL; Slugocki GM; Thaker RL; Dunkan R; Bishop JF; Parks JK
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(2):81-94. PubMed ID: 15099186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of absorbent incontinence pads on pressure management mattresses.
Fader M; Bain D; Cottenden A
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Dec; 48(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 15548247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
