BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16566772)

  • 1. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests.
    Vandenberg N; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 16566772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Identification of semen in bloodstains with the use of alternative light source and biochemical screening tests].
    Gorzkiewicz M; Woźniak M; Grzybowski T; Łuczak S; Linkowska K; Daca P
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2008; 58(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 19441689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests. J Forensic Sci 2006;51(2):361-70.
    Jackson D; Hadi S
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 May; 52(3):740; author reply 741. PubMed ID: 17456107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of modern techniques for saliva screening.
    Myers JR; Adkins WK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):862-7. PubMed ID: 18503523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel approach to obtaining reliable PCR results from luminol treated bloodstains.
    Della Manna A; Montpetit S
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jul; 45(4):886-90. PubMed ID: 10914590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 18637870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemical enhancement techniques of bloodstain patterns and DNA recovery after fire exposure.
    Tontarski KL; Hoskins KA; Watkins TG; Brun-Conti L; Michaud AL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 19018938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection and identification of body fluid stains using antibody-nanoparticle conjugates.
    Frascione N; Thorogate R; Daniel B; Jickells S
    Analyst; 2012 Jan; 137(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 22117199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amylase levels in semen and saliva stains.
    Auvdel MJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Apr; 31(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 2423634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effect of ozone disinfection on forensic identification of blood, saliva, and semen stains.
    Fejes V; Simon G; Makszin L; Sipos K; Poor VS
    Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 38431372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of phenobarbital in bloodstains, semen, seminal stains, saliva, saliva stains, perspiration stains, and hair.
    Smith FP; Pomposini DA
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Jul; 26(3):582-6. PubMed ID: 7252471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An mRNA and DNA co-isolation method for forensic casework samples.
    Alvarez M; Juusola J; Ballantyne J
    Anal Biochem; 2004 Dec; 335(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 15556568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of visualization of biological stains with the use of alternative light source (ALS) for the purpose of genetic identification. Part I. Blood and saliva stains analysis].
    Szeremeta M; Pepiński W; Niemcunowicz-Janica A; Skawrońska M; Sackiewicz A; Ptaszyńska-Sarosiek I; Okłota M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2010; 60(4):248-57. PubMed ID: 21863732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparison of the Bluestar and luminol effectiveness in bloodstain detection].
    łuczak S; Woźniak M; Papuga M; Stopińiska K; Sliwka K
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 17249372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas
    Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evaluation and validation of Phadebas
    Wornes DJ; Speers SJ; Murakami JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():81-88. PubMed ID: 29734053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of amylase testing as a tool for saliva screening of crime scene trace swabs.
    Hedman J; Dalin E; Rasmusson B; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 20457099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the effectiveness of fluorescence for the detection of semen stains on fabrics.
    Kobus HJ; Silenieks E; Scharnberg J
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 12136990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote spectroscopic identification of bloodstains.
    Bremmer RH; Edelman G; Vegter TD; Bijvoets T; Aalders MC
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1471-5. PubMed ID: 21827464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sensitivity and specificity of the RSID-saliva kit for the detection of human salivary amylase in the Forensic Science Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland.
    Casey DG; Price J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):67-71. PubMed ID: 19931992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.