195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16567041)
1. Hippocampus proper distinguishes between identified and unidentified real-life visual objects: an intracranial ERP study.
Vannucci M; Grunwald T; Pezer N; Dietl T; Helmstaedter C; Schaller C; Viggiano MP; Elger CE
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jun; 401(1-2):165-70. PubMed ID: 16567041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hippocampal response to visual objects is related to visual memory functioning.
Vannucci M; Pezer N; Helmstaedter C; Schaller K; Viggiano MP; Elger CE; Grunwald T
Neuroreport; 2008 Jun; 19(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18521002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word imageability affects the hippocampus in recognition memory.
Klaver P; Fell J; Dietl T; Schür S; Schaller C; Elger CE; Fernández G
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 15986408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ERP assessment of functional status in the temporal lobe: examining spatiotemporal correlates of object recognition.
Mazerolle EL; D'Arcy RC; Marchand Y; Bolster RB
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 17673323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perirhinal and hippocampal contributions to visual recognition memory can be distinguished from those of occipito-temporal structures based on conscious awareness of prior occurrence.
Danckert SL; Gati JS; Menon RS; Köhler S
Hippocampus; 2007; 17(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 17696171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gamma oscillatory activity in a visual discrimination task.
Freunberger R; Klimesch W; Sauseng P; Griesmayr B; Höller Y; Pecherstorfer T; Hanslmayr S
Brain Res Bull; 2007 Mar; 71(6):593-600. PubMed ID: 17292802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory.
Schendan HE; Kutas M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):111-35. PubMed ID: 12590847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Object recognition learning differentiates the representations of objects at the ERP component N1.
Wang G; Suemitsu K
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 17141565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans.
Pihlajamäki M; Tanila H; Könönen M; Hänninen T; Hämäläinen A; Soininen H; Aronen HJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 19(7):1939-49. PubMed ID: 15078568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unconscious contextual memory affects early responses in the anterior temporal lobe.
Chaumon M; Hasboun D; Baulac M; Adam C; Tallon-Baudry C
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1285():77-87. PubMed ID: 19505440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing.
Demiral SB; Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1271-85. PubMed ID: 22391475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phase/amplitude reset and theta-gamma interaction in the human medial temporal lobe during a continuous word recognition memory task.
Mormann F; Fell J; Axmacher N; Weber B; Lehnertz K; Elger CE; Fernández G
Hippocampus; 2005; 15(7):890-900. PubMed ID: 16114010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials.
Leek EC; Atherton CJ; Thierry G
Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 17267003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating models of object-decision priming: evidence from event-related potential repetition effects.
Soldan A; Mangels JA; Cooper LA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):230-48. PubMed ID: 16569143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The recognition potential reflects an intermediate level of visual representation.
Zhang Y; Liu Q; Zhang Q
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Apr; 454(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19429060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field potentials in the human hippocampus during the encoding and recognition of visual stimuli.
Paller KA; McCarthy G
Hippocampus; 2002; 12(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 12099492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Event-related potential repetition effects at encoding predict memory performance at test.
Groh-Bordin C; Busch NA; Herrmann CS; Zimmer HD
Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1905-9. PubMed ID: 18007184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hippocampal contributions to the processing of architectural ranking.
Oppenheim I; Vannucci M; Mühlmann H; Gabriel R; Jokeit H; Kurthen M; Krämer G; Grunwald T
Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(2):742-52. PubMed ID: 20053380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Configurational factors in the perception of faces and non-facial objects: an ERP study.
Ishizu T; Ayabe T; Kojima S
Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 118(7):955-66. PubMed ID: 18569153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Similarity dependency of the change in ERP component N1 accompanying with the object recognition learning.
Tokudome W; Wang G
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 22115890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
