These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16567304)
1. How to manage the patient with a high defibrillation threshold. Mainigi SK; Callans DJ Heart Rhythm; 2006 Apr; 3(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 16567304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Successful defibrillation by disconnection of superior vena cava electrode for high defibrillation threshold: a case report]. Matsushita K; Ishikawa T; Sumita S; Kobayashi T; Kawasaki N; Matsumoto K; Taima M; Uchino K; Kimura K; Umemura S J Cardiol; 2005 Jan; 45(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15700927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Device troubleshooting: cross connection of ventricular leads in a patient with decreased right ventricular electrical activity. Kutsuzawa D; Arimoto T; Shishido T; Sasaki S; Iwayama T; Ishigaki D; Takahashi H; Miyashita T; Miyamoto T; Nitobe J; Watanabe T; Kubota I Europace; 2012 Aug; 14(8):1217-9. PubMed ID: 22277642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success of chronic defibrillation and the role of antiarrhythmic drugs with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. Guarnieri T; Levine JH; Veltri EP; Griffith LS; Watkins L; Juanteguy J; Mower MM; Mirowski M Am J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 60(13):1061-4. PubMed ID: 3673907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ventricular defibrillation in the dog with a bielectrode intravascular catheter. Schuder JC; Stoeckle H; West JA; Keskar PY; Gold JH; Denniston RH Arch Intern Med; 1973 Aug; 132(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 4719549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Initial clinical experiences with a transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation system]. Block M; Hammel D; Borggrefe M; Isbruch F; Hachenberg T; Scheld HH; Breithardt G Z Kardiol; 1991 Nov; 80(11):657-64. PubMed ID: 1792807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-determinable defibrillation threshold and inefficacy of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator shocks due to defective connections of the defibrillator lead terminals in the device header port. Maagh P; Trappe HJ; Meissner A Europace; 2007 Dec; 9(12):1161-2. PubMed ID: 17913694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implantation of additional defibrillation lead into the coronary sinus: an effective method of decreasing defibrillation threshold. Wilczek R; Swiątkowski M; Czepiel A; Sterliński M; Makowska E; Kułakowski P Kardiol Pol; 2011; 69(12):1308-9. PubMed ID: 22219117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention and control of ventricular arrhythmias. Willerson JT N Engl J Med; 1980 Aug; 303(6):332-4. PubMed ID: 7383127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Should catheter ablation be the preferred therapy for reducing ICD shocks?: Ventricular tachycardia in patients with an implantable defibrillator warrants catheter ablation. Kuck KH Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):713-20; discussion 720. PubMed ID: 20009082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gentler method of restoring normal heart rhythm. High-frequency, alternating current could replace painful defibrillator shocks. Duke Med Health News; 2012 Jan; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 22324066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New approach to implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in small pediatric patients: dorsal positioning of superior vena cava shock lead in a 3-year-old. Pedersen SB; Smerup MH; Nielsen JC J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 148(1):358-60. PubMed ID: 24685380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Passive electrode effect reduces defibrillation threshold in bi-filament middle cardiac vein defibrillation. Paisey JR; Yue AM; Bessoule F; Roberts PR; Morgan JM Europace; 2006 Feb; 8(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 16627420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should catheter ablation be the preferred therapy for reducing ICD shocks?: Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus drugs for preventing ICD shocks: role of adjuvant antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Patel C; Yan GX; Kocovic D; Kowey PR Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):705-11; discussion 712. PubMed ID: 20009081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effectiveness of the methods of electric cardiac stimulation and low-energy cardioversion-defibrillation in the prevention and treatment of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation]. Pekarskiĭ VV; Gimrikh EO; Oferkin AI; Maslov MG; Vecherskiĭ IuIu; Popov SV; Pekarskaia MV; Porotov AV Kardiologiia; 1990 Nov; 30(11):86-90. PubMed ID: 2087041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]