These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16567638)

  • 21. Atomic hydration potentials using a Monte Carlo Reference State (MCRS) for protein solvation modeling.
    Rakhmanov SV; Makeev VJ
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Mar; 7():19. PubMed ID: 17397537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information.
    Thompson JM; Sgourakis NG; Liu G; Rossi P; Tang Y; Mills JL; Szyperski T; Montelione GT; Baker D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jun; 109(25):9875-80. PubMed ID: 22665781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.
    Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 May; 101(20):7594-9. PubMed ID: 15126668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accurate protein stability predictions from homology models.
    Valanciute A; Nygaard L; Zschach H; Maglegaard Jepsen M; Lindorff-Larsen K; Stein A
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2023; 21():66-73. PubMed ID: 36514339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Best templates outperform homology models in predicting the impact of mutations on protein stability.
    Pak MA; Ivankov DN
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(18):4312-4320. PubMed ID: 35894930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Template-based protein structure prediction in CASP11 and retrospect of I-TASSER in the last decade.
    Yang J; Zhang W; He B; Walker SE; Zhang H; Govindarajoo B; Virtanen J; Xue Z; Shen HB; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):233-46. PubMed ID: 26343917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative modeling without implicit sequence alignments.
    Kolinski A; Gront D
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(19):2522-7. PubMed ID: 17660201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Building and assessing atomic models of proteins from structural templates: learning and benchmarks.
    Vallat BK; Pillardy J; Májek P; Meller J; Blom T; Cao B; Elber R
    Proteins; 2009 Sep; 76(4):930-45. PubMed ID: 19326457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving fragment quality for de novo structure prediction.
    Shrestha R; Zhang KY
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):2240-52. PubMed ID: 24753351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem.
    Qian B; Raman S; Das R; Bradley P; McCoy AJ; Read RJ; Baker D
    Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7167):259-64. PubMed ID: 17934447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. X-ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design.
    Schneider M; Fu X; Keating AE
    Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 19422060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A "FRankenstein's monster" approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of Fold-Recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation.
    Kosinski J; Cymerman IA; Feder M; Kurowski MA; Sasin JM; Bujnicki JM
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():369-79. PubMed ID: 14579325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Building and refining protein models within cryo-electron microscopy density maps based on homology modeling and multiscale structure refinement.
    Zhu J; Cheng L; Fang Q; Zhou ZH; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2010 Apr; 397(3):835-51. PubMed ID: 20109465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination.
    Mukherjee S; Zhang Y
    Structure; 2011 Jul; 19(7):955-66. PubMed ID: 21742262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy.
    Melo F; Feytmans E
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Apr; 277(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 9571028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The JCSG MR pipeline: optimized alignments, multiple models and parallel searches.
    Schwarzenbacher R; Godzik A; Jaroszewski L
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2008 Jan; 64(Pt 1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18094477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: simultaneous folding, docking and refinement of peptides onto their receptors.
    Raveh B; London N; Zimmerman L; Schueler-Furman O
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18934. PubMed ID: 21572516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures.
    Mao B; Tejero R; Baker D; Montelione GT
    J Am Chem Soc; 2014 Feb; 136(5):1893-906. PubMed ID: 24392845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ProALIGN: Directly Learning Alignments for Protein Structure Prediction via Exploiting Context-Specific Alignment Motifs.
    Kong L; Ju F; Zheng WM; Zhu J; Sun S; Xu J; Bu D
    J Comput Biol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 35073170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sequence alignment using machine learning for accurate template-based protein structure prediction.
    Makigaki S; Ishida T
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 31197318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.