283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16568635)
1. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict.
Lew TA; Morrow EH; Rice WR
Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16568635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
Linder JE; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic variation in male and female reproductive characters associated with sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
Friberg U
Behav Genet; 2005 Jul; 35(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 15971026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
Friberg U; Lew TA; Byrne PG; Rice WR
Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intralocus sexual conflict.
van Doorn GS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The genetic architecture of sexual conflict: male harm and female resistance in Callosobruchus maculatus.
Gay L; Brown E; Tregenza T; Pincheira-Donoso D; Eady PE; Vasudev R; Hunt J; Hosken DJ
J Evol Biol; 2011 Feb; 24(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 21126275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual conflict is not counterbalanced by good genes in the laboratory Drosophila melanogaster model system.
Stewart AD; Hannes AM; Mirzatuny A; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1808-13. PubMed ID: 18681915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
McKean KA; Nunney L
Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The timing of mating influences reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster: implications for sexual conflict.
Long TA; Pischedda A; Nichols RV; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2010 May; 23(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20345814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses.
Byrne PG; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1324-31. PubMed ID: 16135127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae).
Bonduriansky R; Rowe L
Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1965-75. PubMed ID: 16261734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the extent of genome-wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender-limited selection.
Morrow EH; Stewart AD; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1046-54. PubMed ID: 18462311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution.
Prasad NG; Bedhomme S; Day T; Chippindale AK
Am Nat; 2007 Jan; 169(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 17206582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A QTL analysis of female variation contributing to refractoriness and sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.
Lawniczak MK; Begun DJ
Genet Res; 2005 Oct; 86(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 16356284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression.
Harano T; Okada K; Nakayama S; Miyatake T; Hosken DJ
Curr Biol; 2010 Nov; 20(22):2036-9. PubMed ID: 21055943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of harm--effect of sexual conflicts and population size.
Gay L; Hosken DJ; Eady P; Vasudev R; Tregenza T
Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 21050188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae).
Bonduriansky R; Rowe L
Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 15792234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
