These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16569145)

  • 1. The generation and resemblance heuristics in face recognition: cooperation and competition.
    Kleider HM; Goldinger SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):259-76. PubMed ID: 16569145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.
    Busey TA; Arici A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1123-36. PubMed ID: 19686009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating positive and negative influences of verbal processing on the recognition of pictures of faces and objects.
    Nakabayashi K; Burton AM; Brandimonte MA; Lloyd-Jones TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):376-90. PubMed ID: 21988409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.
    Collin CA; Byrne S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20384415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative faces: encoding of family resemblance relative to gender means in face space.
    Griffin HJ; McOwan PW; Johnston A
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angry faces are special too: evidence from the visual scanpath.
    Bate S; Haslam C; Hodgson TL
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Sep; 23(5):658-67. PubMed ID: 19702419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of face familiarity on age decision.
    Bruyer R; Mejias S; Doublet S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):159-76. PubMed ID: 16643811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use.
    Pachur T; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociations of face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 15811237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?
    Casey SJ; Newell FN
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiarity and face processing.
    Osborne CD; Stevenage SV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 22906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It just felt right: the neural correlates of the fluency heuristic.
    Volz KG; Schooler LJ; von Cramon DY
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Sep; 19(3):829-37. PubMed ID: 20558088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces.
    Gonzalez-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; Gomez-Velazquez FR; Alvelais Alarcón M; Moises de la Serna Tuya J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 17555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Shastri KK; Abdi H; Neville-Smith M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1207-30. PubMed ID: 19686016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition.
    Pascalis O; Hunkin NM; Holdstock JS; Isaac CL; Mayes AR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 15193938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.