These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16569154)

  • 1. Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 16569154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.
    Onishi KH; Chambers KE; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):B13-23. PubMed ID: 11814489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The different time course of phonotactic constraint learning in children and adults: Evidence from speech errors.
    Smalle EHM; Muylle M; Szmalec A; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28383954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.
    Anderson ND; Dell GS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):3617-3622. PubMed ID: 29555766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the retention and time course of phonotactic constraint learning from production experience.
    Warker JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22686839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):821-8. PubMed ID: 20438279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sleep underpins the plasticity of language production.
    Gaskell MG; Warker J; Lindsay S; Frost R; Guest J; Snowdon R; Stackhouse A
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jul; 25(7):1457-65. PubMed ID: 24894583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience.
    Warker JA; Dell GS; Whalen CA; Gereg S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1289-95. PubMed ID: 18763905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian.
    Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation.
    Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics.
    Redford MA
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):785-816. PubMed ID: 18237726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables.
    Warker JA; Xu Y; Dell GS; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 19398099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The functional unit in phonological encoding: evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers.
    Kureta Y; Fushimi T; Tatsumi IF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1102-19. PubMed ID: 16938049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning phonotactic-like regularities in immediate serial recall.
    Fischer-Baum S; Warker JA; Holloway C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):129-146. PubMed ID: 31928028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not.
    Bian Y; Dell GS
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):176-187. PubMed ID: 31879827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English.
    Cholin J; Dell GS; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 21244111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: implications for a new model of speech production.
    Romani C; Galluzzi C; Bureca I; Olson A
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Mar; 62(2):151-92. PubMed ID: 21109241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual constraints in phonotactic learning.
    Endress AD; Mehler J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):235-50. PubMed ID: 20121307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of phoneme position overlap on the phonemic similarity effect in nonword recall.
    Nimmo LM; Roodenrys S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):577-96. PubMed ID: 16627357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.