291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16569197)
21. Forensic DNA testing.
Weedn VW; Roby RK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 May; 117(5):486-91. PubMed ID: 8489337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA Data Collection and Analysis in the Forensic Arena.
Grabell S; Shomron N
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2243():355-368. PubMed ID: 33606268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Crime and punishment.
Opar A
Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Forensic DNA and bioinformatics.
Bianchi L; Liò P
Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17384432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA typing in forensic medicine and in criminal investigations: a current survey.
Benecke M
Naturwissenschaften; 1997 May; 84(5):181-8. PubMed ID: 9210153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A study of Spanish attitudes regarding the custody and use of forensic DNA databases.
Gamero JJ; Romero JL; Peralta JL; Corte-Real F; Guillén M; Anjos MJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 19083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
Rosen C
New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. DNA testing for all.
Williamson R; Duncan R
Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):585-6. PubMed ID: 12167832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling part I: a review of the legal literature.
Walsh SJ
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Dec; 155(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 16216711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
Burk DL
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. DNA evidence in rape cases and the Debbie Smith Act: forensic practice and criminal justice implications.
Telsavaara TV; Arrigo BA
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Oct; 50(5):487-505. PubMed ID: 16943376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. DNA typing: a most useful forensic tool.
Palermo GB
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Oct; 50(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 16943375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Molecular genetics revolutionized forensic medicine].
Sajantila A
Duodecim; 1999; 115(14):1545-51. PubMed ID: 11912645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA identification systems: social policy and civil liberties concerns.
Bereano PL
J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):146-55. PubMed ID: 11651004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Inclusiveness, effectiveness and intrusiveness: issues in the developing uses of DNA profiling in support of criminal investigations.
Williams R; Johnson P
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):545-58. PubMed ID: 16240734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Field-based detection of biological samples for forensic analysis: Established techniques, novel tools, and future innovations.
Morrison J; Watts G; Hobbs G; Dawnay N
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():147-160. PubMed ID: 29518713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. DNA fingerprinting on trial: the dramatic early history of a new forensic technique.
Aronson JD
Endeavour; 2005 Sep; 29(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 16087235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Past, present and future of forensic DNA typing.
Giardina E; Spinella A; Novelli G
Nanomedicine (Lond); 2011 Feb; 6(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 21385128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
