BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16569300)

  • 1. An analysis of the costs of implementing the National Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England.
    Uus K; Bamford J; Taylor R
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 16569300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of Newborn Hearing Screening Programme delivered by health visitors.
    Basu S; Evans KL; Owen M; Harbottle T
    Child Care Health Dev; 2008 Sep; 34(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 18796055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs and performance of early hearing detection programmes in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Olusanya BO; Emokpae A; Renner JK; Wirz SL
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2009 Feb; 103(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 18814895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening.
    Grill E; Uus K; Hessel F; Davies L; Taylor RS; Wasem J; Bamford J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16504089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
    Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First estimates of the potential cost and cost saving of protecting childhood hearing from damage caused by congenital CMV infection.
    Williams EJ; Gray J; Luck S; Atkinson C; Embleton ND; Kadambari S; Davis A; Griffiths P; Sharland M; Berrington JE; Clark JE
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2015 Nov; 100(6):F501-6. PubMed ID: 26122458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost analysis of an Italian neonatal hearing screening programme.
    Mezzano P; Serra G; Calevo MG;
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Sep; 22(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 19526434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening introduced to NICU infants in Canterbury Province, New Zealand.
    Flynn M; Austin N; Flynn TS; Ford R; Buckland L
    N Z Med J; 2004 Nov; 117(1206):U1183. PubMed ID: 15570352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.
    Lemons J; Fanaroff A; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Murray G; Diefendorf A
    J Perinatol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11896516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness and test-performance factors in relation to universal newborn hearing screening.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 12784228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
    J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme.
    Cao-Nguyen MH; Kos MI; Guyot JP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1591-5. PubMed ID: 17719096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal hearing screening: a combined click evoked and tone burst otoacoustic emission approach.
    Zhang VW; McPherson B; Shi BX; Tang JL; Wong BY
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 72(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 18178260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Societal cost of pre-lingual deafness].
    Bubbico L; Bartolucci MA; Broglio D; Boner A
    Ann Ig; 2007; 19(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 17547219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
    Mathur NN; Dhawan R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing and monitoring the impact of the national newborn hearing screening program in Israel.
    Wasser J; Ari-Even Roth D; Herzberg O; Lerner-Geva L; Rubin L
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2019 Mar; 8(1):30. PubMed ID: 30857547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fundamentals of hearing screening in neonates (standard of care)].
    Ptok M
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2003; 207(5):194-6. PubMed ID: 14600855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.