235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16569300)
21. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country.
Olusanya BO
Child Care Health Dev; 2009 Mar; 35(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 19228154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Universal newborn hearing screening.
Stone KA; Smith BD; Lembke JM; Clark LA; McLellan MB
J Fam Pract; 2000 Nov; 49(11):1012-6. PubMed ID: 11093567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Economic evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry screening in California.
Feuchtbaum L; Cunningham G
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5 Pt 2):S280-6. PubMed ID: 16735254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Economic evaluation of long-term impacts of universal newborn hearing screening.
Chiou ST; Lung HL; Chen LS; Yen AM; Fann JC; Chiu SY; Chen HH
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27598544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The economics of screening infants at risk of hearing impairment: an international analysis.
Burke MJ; Shenton RC; Taylor MJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 76(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 22129917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interprofessional working in the context of newborn hearing screening: Education and Social Services compare challenges.
Young A; McCracken W; Tattersall H; Bamford J
J Interprof Care; 2005 Aug; 19(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 16076599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Is universal newborn hearing screening more efficient with auditory evoked potentials compared to otoacoustic emissions?].
Granell J; Gavilanes J; Herrero J; Sánchez-Jara JL; Velasco MJ; Martín G
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Apr; 59(4):170-5. PubMed ID: 18447975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening for early detection of permanent congenital hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria.
Olusanya BO; Wirz SL; Luxon LM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 18433883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Model project of hearing screening in new-born in Hanover (preliminary results)].
Buser K; Bietendüwel A; Krauth C; Jalilvand N; Meyer S; Reuter G; Stolle S; Altenhofen L; Lenarz T
Gesundheitswesen; 2003 Mar; 65(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 12698391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Use and results of universal newborn hearing screening with ALGO portable device].
Bretschneider J; Maier H; Hess M; Leuwer R
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):357-64. PubMed ID: 11488145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases.
Uus K; Bamford J
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e887-93. PubMed ID: 16651292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Incidence of hypoacusia secondary to hyperbilirubinaemia in a universal neonatal auditory screening programme based on otoacoustic emissions and evoked auditory potentials].
Núñez-Batalla F; Carro-Fernández P; Antuña-León ME; González-Trelles T
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Mar; 59(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 18364202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Screening project of identification of hearing deficits in newborns].
Møller TR; Jensen FK; Ekmann A; Wetke R; Ovesen T
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):900-3. PubMed ID: 17359732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.
Stevens JC; Hall DM; Davis A; Davies CM; Dixon S
Arch Dis Child; 1998 Jan; 78(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 9534670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An implementation study of neonatal hearing screening in the Netherlands.
Uilenburg N; Kauffman-de Boer M; van der Ploeg K; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Verkerk P
Int J Audiol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):108-16. PubMed ID: 19283582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening programs: protocol for developing countries.
Bansal S; Gupta A; Nagarkar A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1059-63. PubMed ID: 18479757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Screening for hearing loss and middle-ear effusion in school-age children, using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a feasibility study.
Georgalas C; Xenellis J; Davilis D; Tzangaroulakis A; Ferekidis E
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Dec; 122(12):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18423079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
