174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16569560)
1. Do operator volumes relate to clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the Canadian health care system?
Cantor WJ; Hall R; Tu JV
Am Heart J; 2006 Apr; 151(4):902-8. PubMed ID: 16569560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting.
Harjai KJ; Berman AD; Grines CL; Kahn J; Marsalese D; Mehta RH; Schreiber T; Boura JA; O'Neill WW
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug; 94(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 15325922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.
Jamal SM; Shrive FM; Ghali WA; Knudtson ML; Eisenberg MJ;
Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 12813611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between operator volume and adverse outcome in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention practice: an analysis of a quality-controlled multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention clinical database.
Moscucci M; Share D; Smith D; O'Donnell MJ; Riba A; McNamara R; Lalonde T; Defranco AC; Patel K; Kline Rogers E; D'Haem C; Karve M; Eagle KA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 16098426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era.
Hannan EL; Wu C; Walford G; King SB; Holmes DR; Ambrose JA; Sharma S; Katz S; Clark LT; Jones RH
Circulation; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1171-9. PubMed ID: 16103238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The lack of a simple relation between physician's percutaneous coronary intervention volume and outcomes in the era of coronary stenting: a two-centre experience.
Mustafa MU; Cohen M; Zapotulko K; Feinberg M; Miller MF; Aueron F; Wasty N; Tanwir A; Rogal G
Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Dec; 59(12):1401-7. PubMed ID: 16351671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional volumes and coronary angioplasty outcomes before and after the introduction of stenting.
Maynard C; Every NR; Chapko MK; Ritchie JL
Eff Clin Pract; 1999; 2(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 10538258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases.
Moscucci M; Eagle KA; Share D; Smith D; De Franco AC; O'Donnell M; Kline-Rogers E; Jani SM; Brown DL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(11):1759-65. PubMed ID: 15936602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operator volume and outcomes of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in a single high-volume centre.
Politi A; Galli M; Zerboni S; Michi R; De Marco F; Llambro M; Ferrari G
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 Oct; 7(10):761-7. PubMed ID: 17001238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the institutional volume-outcome relations for balloon angioplasty and stenting in the stent era in California.
Brown DL
Am Heart J; 2003 Dec; 146(6):1071-6. PubMed ID: 14661001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry).
Feldman DN; Gade CL; Slotwiner AJ; Parikh M; Bergman G; Wong SC; Minutello RM;
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 98(10):1334-9. PubMed ID: 17134624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Certificate of need, volume, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcomes.
Ho V
Am Heart J; 2004 Mar; 147(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 14999192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistent sex difference in hospital outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the New York State reporting system.
Srinivas VS; Garg S; Negassa A; Bang JY; Monrad ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 19(6):265-8. PubMed ID: 17541128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Narrowing the gap: early and intermediate outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft procedures in California, 1997 to 2006.
Carey JS; Danielsen B; Milliken J; Li Z; Stabile BE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 19837215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proliferation of cardiac technology in Canada: a challenge to the sustainability of Medicare.
Alter DA; Stukel TA; Newman A
Circulation; 2006 Jan; 113(3):380-7. PubMed ID: 16432069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The volume-outcome relationship of percutaneous coronary intervention: can current procedure volume minimums be applied to a developing country?
Lin HC; Lee HC; Chu CH
Am Heart J; 2008 Mar; 155(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 18294495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.
Zacharias A; Schwann TA; Riordan CJ; Durham SJ; Shah A; Papadimos TJ; Engoren M; Habib RH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1961-9. PubMed ID: 15919292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in operator and hospital procedure volume and outcomes for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 1996 to 2001.
Kansagra SM; Curtis LH; Anstrom KJ; Schulman KA
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 99(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 17261394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Apolito RA; Greenberg MA; Menegus MA; Lowe AM; Sleeper LA; Goldberger MH; Remick J; Radford MJ; Hochman JS
Am Heart J; 2008 Feb; 155(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 18215596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
