These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16570900)
1. Intervertebral prosthesis versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: one-year results of a prospective non-randomised study. Schroven I; Dorofey D Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 16570900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Crandall DG; Revella J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Outcome after cervical anterior fusion--a clinical study of 368 patients]. Lemcke J; Menz H; Al-Zain F; Meier U Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(6):744-52. PubMed ID: 18072041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion. Swan J; Hurwitz E; Malek F; van den Haak E; Cheng I; Alamin T; Carragee E Spine J; 2006; 6(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 17088191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior tension band plating: retrospective analysis. Freudenberger C; Lindley EM; Beard DW; Reckling WC; Williams A; Burger EL; Patel VV Orthopedics; 2009 Jul; 32(7):492. PubMed ID: 19634851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Implantation of the ProDisc intervertebral disk prosthesis for the lumbar spine]. Ogon M; Howanietz N; Tuschel A; Chavanne A; Meissner J; Becker S Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Jun; 19(2):209-30. PubMed ID: 17530199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Perioperative morbidity in lumbar disc replacement]. Däxle M; Käfer W; Kocak T; Reichel H; Cakir B Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20714984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Slosar PJ; Josey R; Reynolds J Spine J; 2007; 7(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 17482113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Videbaek TS; Christensen FB; Soegaard R; Hansen ES; Høy K; Helmig P; Niedermann B; Eiskjoer SP; Bünger CE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2875-80. PubMed ID: 17139217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study]. Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Ha KY; Lee JS; Kim KW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):1192-8. PubMed ID: 18469692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11-13 year follow-up. Andersen T; Videbaek TS; Hansen ES; Bünger C; Christensen FB Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 17851701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Instability of lower lumbar treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest or interbody fusion cage: a comparative study]. Wang R; Lin X; Shi S; Xiu Z; Guo Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(8):928-32. PubMed ID: 18773807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, prospective, and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion. Foley KT; Mroz TE; Arnold PM; Chandler HC; Dixon RA; Girasole GJ; Renkens KL; Riew KD; Sasso RC; Smith RC; Tung H; Wecht DA; Whiting DM Spine J; 2008; 8(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 17983841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement. Yaszay B; Bendo JA; Goldstein JA; Quirno M; Spivak JM; Errico TJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):508-12; discussion 513. PubMed ID: 18317194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]